Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JCEccles

So well said! : )


15,509 posted on 04/29/2007 7:05:33 PM PDT by TAdams8591
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15503 | View Replies ]


To: TAdams8591; EternalVigilance; Oliver Optic; little jeremiah
Thanks for the comments, but I really didn't say anything that you all haven't already said at one time or another. The Edmund Burke quote was spot-on too.

It troubles me to hear the argument, "Rudy may be a liberal, but he'll keep us safe from terrorists!" To what end? If he joins with fellow social liberals Reid and Pelosi to advance a social liberal agenda he will have saved America's families from the terrorists' knives only to sacrifice them on the altar of home-grown liberalism.

With Reid and Pelosi in charge of Congress, it would be arguably easier for a Republican president to foist a social liberal agenda on us than it would be for a Democrat president. With Giuliani ramrodding the liberal Democrats' social liberal legislation through, Republican opposition in Congress could be expected to be fractured and dispirited.

A Giuliani-Clinton (or Giuliani-Obama) race would be a lose-lose proposition for America's traditional families.

15,729 posted on 04/29/2007 8:31:18 PM PDT by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15509 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson