Posted on 04/21/2007 6:42:25 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
I've been missing you. Thought maybe you ran off to a desert island with a boy toy. lolol
I'm not so sure of that. Reagan built his own coalition. Reagan was Reagan. "He was a man, take him for all in all, I shall not look upon his like again."
Please tell us then why you would support a candidate with Giuliani's record of abortion and gun control which are CLEARLY not conservative.
Unbelievable.
What I have stated is that REASONABLE PEOPLE should be allowed to discuss things REASONABLY
This is your site - I was wrong to sign up - I’ve known for years your ‘mission statement’ is totally hypercritical. It seems to me the one getting hysterical here is you with your demand all should 'tow one line' - but, it's obviously your right to do so - you control all - you delete unwanted posts, ban those that refuse to "tow your line", etc., ...(it's called censorship) so, yes, THAT IS STALINIST. It's the very definition.
You can scream from the mountain top as loud as you want - BUT, facts are facts...you behave like STALIN... Continue screaming like a 2 year old child, argue with the direct evidence - I stopped arguing with 2 year olds sometime ago.
rockrr:
Since up until this post I haven't "spewed" anything other than a request for "reasoned debate" - I question which of of us is the brighter of the two...But I understand - I may not totally agree with everything you or Jim believes - therefore I'm to be subjected to personal attacks, profanity, vulgarity, threats, racial or religious bigotry.
See it's allowed if it's Jim doing it - or someone supporting Jim doing it... If this post ever sees the light of day - well fill your boots, rant and rave to your hearts content...I'm done - I'll not be back to point out the nuttyness of your future rantings...seriously Bye now, oh, have fun 'yall
I want to go. Got a link?
However, on your point #3, Mia was doing more than just stating a so-called "plausible theory" (which I provided a counterargument to), she was using a reference for that theory her own previous vanity. In other words, since she was using herself as a citation, she was endorsing the theory, not just stating it.
But that's a nitpick.
Your characterizations of the deleted posts are pretty much correct. The third was mine, deleted on my request after I was asked to do so by Mia. I made the deletion request as a gesture of goodwill -- however, I saw no legitimate reason that the original posts of Mia should have been pulled. If she wanted to get her facts straight, she should have done so prior to posting or else post a correction after the fact. I have never, nor will I ever, ask a post to be pulled because I made an error.
Actually, the DUmmies have more integrety than the disgruntled FRiberals. When the DUmmies want to trash us, they do it on an open forum, they are not hiding on some secret thread that only INVITED members can access.
BS - you just divide, sheeps, goats, doesn’t matter to a fifth columnist disruptor like you.
Zotting a DUmmie troll is one thing... fellow FReepers going off the deep end is not a cause for mirth.
I’d like to be the first to say, good riddance.
Will the ‘opus’s never end?
Just say GOODBYE!
It is if that is your goal.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, I know - I won’t be missed - got it...:o))
Like a moth to a candle they simply can’t stay away.
I’m not a lady so see if you can figure this out. Never mind, I’ll get banned for blackguarding.
Well there's your problem - you're just not very bright. Why else would you admit that it's Jim's right to do as he wishes, yet contradict yourself in the very same sentence by claiming that very behavior is Stalinist?
I support conservatism, and those who advance it. I know that galls you, but there's nothing I can do about that, troll.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.