Posted on 04/21/2007 6:42:25 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
You might like this hate back and forth but old time FReepers never were like this. We had it out but we didn't attack. When I see this I think of opposition tactics.
If you like snuff videos, it's the best!
Let’s just admit it that we are all jealous that we didn’t think to go grab that screen name a month ago.
:-)
What does Billy Mays have to do with anything?
She quit. Nobody killer her off. She posted an anti-Thompson piece that had already been posted twice before, and then didn’t even stay around to DISCUSS it, she just said she was posting it and leaving.
So I don’t know where you get that “killing off the intellectuals” statement from my post.
Rudy is discussing using the flat tax as a model to simplify the tax code. That is as anti-socialist as it gets. If you’r going to come to a forum to discuss politics you should get your terminology right. Words have meanings.
“One thing is for sure, Hillary and Obama do not get us closer to any ONE of the goals of this site.”
There is a certain amount of power in being in the opposition. We were able to defeat HillaryCare in 93, while in the minority, but failed to stop the Medicare Prescription Drug program when we were the majority.
It will be easier to for us to take on and defeat Democrat socialist policies than it will to defeat liberal Republican policies.
And we won’t have to sell out our pro-life principles in the process.
Orthodox Presbyterian, huh?
In the end, you've made the decision to support a liberal named Rudy Giulaini to be the GOP standard bearer. You will support a liberal for POTUS. You're on record. Thanks.
Well if you think that "in the end", Rudy will be our nominee, then your statement applies. I however, don't think that will be the case. But I'm sorry to hear that you are on the record saying such a defeatist thing.
If you agree with Rudy 75%-80% of the time, you're a liberal.
Entitled, yes. But a POV based on false allegations such as "the GOP as currently constituted believes that it their duty to impose Judeo Christian values" *and* "One of the reasons the GOP has been losing elections is exactly that" is a bunch of MSM hooey.
I'm sorry, guess I did misinterpret your post.
Part of the communist idea to infiltrate America was to get control of one or both parties. They have one of them, and I guess people like us want to keep them from getting both.
You clarified it and we are in agreement. I am sorry if I flamed you.
Passionate conservative, you know!
No surprise.
There have been a handful of FReepers who said they would VOTE for Hillary! if Rudy is the nominee. For example:
To: pissant
If someone were to hold a gun to my head and say vote for Hillary or Rudy, Id vote for Hillary. If we have to have evil in the WH, let it be of the other party.
I will never vote for turning the party over to the likes of Rudy Guliani.
26 posted on 04/20/2007 8:06:33 PM EDT by JRochelle (Al Sharpton: Its hard out here for a race pimp.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1820904/posts?page=26#26
To: zarf
Actually, if Hillary! supported the war, I might vote for her. We KNOW shes a ruthless b!tch - if she used that against our nations enemies like she does against her own, we might finish this war up with a total victory...
22 posted on 04/12/2007 9:54:32 AM EDT by Little Ray (Rudy Guiliani: if his wives can’t trust him, why should we?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1816089/posts?page=22#22
Researching something like this is NOT easy, and requires wading through hundreds of Google search results.
Like the majority of FReepers who have largely been avoiding the [insert name of Republican Presidential candidate here] bash-a-palooza threads, I am sick and tired of the personal attacks coming from ALL sides. Unfortunately, they have been spilling over onto threads that have absolutely nothing to do with Rudy, Romney, McCain, Thompson, Hunter, etc.
It makes very little sense to me to cannibalize each other. I simply don’t get why people can’t disagree without descending into personal attacks.
You are correct. I don't recall this sort of flaming even with the Buchanan or Keyes candidacies, only when the Rudy Giuliani group jumped in with an attempt to force everyone to go along with him "because only he can win", then promptly tried to redefine the meaning of "conservative" to include abortion, gun control and other issues that offend peoples' principles.
Caption: “How did I get stuck sitting next to this guy — and on his LEFT, for God’s sake”
Gotta go out.
Yeah like you! Goodbye toots!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.