Skip to comments.
Will FR embrace socialism to make way for Rudy Giuliani as a Republican presidential candidate?
vanity
| April 21, 2007
| Jim Robinson
Posted on 04/21/2007 6:42:25 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 18,081-18,100, 18,101-18,120, 18,121-18,140 ... 18,461-18,471 next last
To: BykrBayb
To: EternalVigilance
Oh Lordy-lord, he's desperate. Do what he say. Do what he say.
18,102
posted on
05/02/2007 10:56:31 PM PDT
by
BykrBayb
(May the way of the hero lead to the triforce! Þ)
To: BykrBayb
To: crude77
“Sober since 2-18-98”
Sober since 2-5-94, where I also learned restraint of tongue and pen, and the serenity prayer too.
To: Jim Robinson
God bless you, Jim.
To: truth_seeker
To: rbmillerjr
He is a legend in his own mind. Can’t stop going everywhere to tell people how smart he is. He will never get a scientific journal wrote wasting his time bragging about himself.
To: T'wit
>>I got really unhappy with Splenda a few months ago when I read a doctor’s report that the stuff DOES have calories. It can be advertised as zero calories under the arcane rules of federal bureaucracy,<<
Yep, by rounding even bacon could be a “zero calorie food” if you made the serving size small enough.
18,108
posted on
05/03/2007 2:58:54 AM PDT
by
gondramB
(God only has ten rules, uncle Hank, and he has a much bigger house.)
To: metmom
>>They wouldnt have you anyway. They are far less tolerant of dissenting opinion than JR is. Here, they can support evolution. There, you cant support creation.<<
Believing the first life was created doesn’t conflict with the evidence - rational scientists don’t argue otherwise. Its when someone claims that the earth is only 6,000 years old that people with science backgrounds tend to assume the person is not reasonable enough to bother with.
To clarify, the term “young earth creationist” is sometimes used.
18,109
posted on
05/03/2007 3:06:55 AM PDT
by
gondramB
(God only has ten rules, uncle Hank, and he has a much bigger house.)
To: gondramB
>> Its when someone claims that the earth is only 6,000 years old that people with science backgrounds tend to assume the person is not reasonable enough to bother with.
It is not widely known, but that dating was not done by the Bishop of Ussher. It was done by a scientist -- one who would be on anyone's list of the top twenty who ever lived, Johannes Kepler. Ussher merely redid and checked the calculation later, and arrived at a nearly identical figure (I think it differed by twelve years). If I recall, Kepler published his result in Mysterium Cosmographicum (1596).
The calculation was, of course, biblical exegesis, and we suppose we have better methods of dating now.
18,110
posted on
05/03/2007 4:02:53 AM PDT
by
T'wit
(If reproductive success is the mainspring of evolutionary advance, why is it so damned clumsy?)
To: metmom
18110 should have been addressed to you also.
18,111
posted on
05/03/2007 4:03:59 AM PDT
by
T'wit
(If reproductive success is the mainspring of evolutionary advance, why is it so damned clumsy?)
To: gondramB
>> Yep, by rounding even bacon could be a zero calorie food if you made the serving size small enough.
Stand by for the No Fat Bacon Company. Fortunes can be made :-)
18,112
posted on
05/03/2007 4:07:20 AM PDT
by
T'wit
(If reproductive success is the mainspring of evolutionary advance, why is it so damned clumsy?)
To: T'wit
>>The calculation was, of course, biblical exegesis, and we suppose we have better methods of dating now.<<
Not the least of which is how long it would take to deposit the layers of the grand canyon, have them compress, bend and fold and then have water wear down through a mile of solid rock.
18,113
posted on
05/03/2007 4:09:47 AM PDT
by
gondramB
(God only has ten rules, uncle Hank, and he has a much bigger house.)
To: si tacuissem; Liz; indylindy
"Over 850 freeper took part in this thread, 39 are now banned or suspended" Unfortunately, some of these have already returned.
18,114
posted on
05/03/2007 6:02:47 AM PDT
by
TommyDale
("Can debate over four hours with no need to call a doctor!")
To: gondramB
Meant to mention before, I came across a no-calorie chocolate sauce. This seems impossible, and you can't attribute this to a small serving size, but they insist -- zero calories. Stuff tastes pretty good, too.
On to no-calorie peanut butter.
18,115
posted on
05/03/2007 6:28:54 AM PDT
by
T'wit
(If reproductive success is the mainspring of evolutionary advance, why is it so damned clumsy?)
To: TommyDale
>> Unfortunately, some of these have already returned.
Unfortunate indeed, unless they have a change of heart and rededicate themselves to Free Republic's philosophy and rules. We are all better parted unless we share the same broad conservative view and sense of fair play.
18,116
posted on
05/03/2007 6:38:28 AM PDT
by
T'wit
(If reproductive success is the mainspring of evolutionary advance, why is it so damned clumsy?)
To: TommyDale
Any idea which are back and why?
18,117
posted on
05/03/2007 6:40:27 AM PDT
by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: wagglebee
No, but I recall seeing one suspended, then she was back on in a couple of days, then disappeared again. I think they are all over at WideAwakes licking their wounds.
18,118
posted on
05/03/2007 6:41:37 AM PDT
by
TommyDale
("Can debate over four hours with no need to call a doctor!")
To: Alamo-Girl
Indeed. It seems to me they would have a real problem arguing against equal rights for animals, pedophilia, bestiality, infanticide, etc. - or conversely, in favor of personal responsibility. To say that the moral law is "whatever I say it is," and one person's moral law is just as good as the other guy's ("different strokes for different folks"), is tantamount to saying there is no moral law. Period. All becomes "relative" to the needs and desires of my ego....
You cannot have a just, secure society premised on such a shaky basis.... FWIW
18,119
posted on
05/03/2007 6:56:04 AM PDT
by
betty boop
("Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind." -- A. Einstein.)
To: NautiNurse
The owls are not what they seem.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 18,081-18,100, 18,101-18,120, 18,121-18,140 ... 18,461-18,471 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson