Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gondramB
>> Its when someone claims that the earth is only 6,000 years old that people with science backgrounds tend to assume the person is not reasonable enough to bother with.

It is not widely known, but that dating was not done by the Bishop of Ussher. It was done by a scientist -- one who would be on anyone's list of the top twenty who ever lived, Johannes Kepler. Ussher merely redid and checked the calculation later, and arrived at a nearly identical figure (I think it differed by twelve years). If I recall, Kepler published his result in Mysterium Cosmographicum (1596).

The calculation was, of course, biblical exegesis, and we suppose we have better methods of dating now.

18,110 posted on 05/03/2007 4:02:53 AM PDT by T'wit (If reproductive success is the mainspring of evolutionary advance, why is it so damned clumsy?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18109 | View Replies ]


To: metmom

18110 should have been addressed to you also.


18,111 posted on 05/03/2007 4:03:59 AM PDT by T'wit (If reproductive success is the mainspring of evolutionary advance, why is it so damned clumsy?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18110 | View Replies ]

To: T'wit

>>The calculation was, of course, biblical exegesis, and we suppose we have better methods of dating now.<<

Not the least of which is how long it would take to deposit the layers of the grand canyon, have them compress, bend and fold and then have water wear down through a mile of solid rock.


18,113 posted on 05/03/2007 4:09:47 AM PDT by gondramB (God only has ten rules, uncle Hank, and he has a much bigger house.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18110 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson