Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

150-story skyscraper could become tallest in U.S.
AP ^ | Friday, April 20, 2007

Posted on 04/20/2007 2:56:15 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican

CHICAGO, Illinois (AP) -- The city's planning board has endorsed a proposal for a twisting lakefront tower that would become the nation's tallest building.

With Thursday's approval from the Chicago Plan Commission, the design and site plan for the 2,000-foot Chicago Spire goes to the city zoning committee next week.

"This is a wonderful project, and everyone is very enthused," said Constance Buscemi, spokeswoman for the city's planning department.

The 150-story tower, which would feature 1,200 residences, would unseat Chicago's 1,451-foot Sears Tower as the tallest U.S. building. It would also top New York's 1,776-foot Freedom Tower, under construction at the former World Trade Center site.

The Chicago Spire was designed by Santiago Calatrava, the Spanish-born architect known for designing the Milwaukee Art Museum addition and the Athens Olympic sports complex.

If the zoning panel approves the plan, the City Council will consider it May 9. If it is approved, construction would begin this spring, said Thomas Murphy, general counsel to developer Shelbourne Development Ltd.

Shelbourne executives have declined to estimate the building's total development cost. Real estate experts put it at well over $1 billion, the Chicago Tribune and Crain's Chicago Business reported on their Web sites Thursday.

The tallest building in the world is the Taipei 101 tower in Taiwan, which measures 1,671 feet and 101 floors. A tower in Dubai now under construction is expected to rise beyond 2,300 feet and more than 160 floors .

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: chicago; skyscraper; skyscrapers; tallestbuilding
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

1 posted on 04/20/2007 2:56:16 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

I thought “Twizzle Stick” was an apt description. The other one I can’t post here.


2 posted on 04/20/2007 2:58:44 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

3 posted on 04/20/2007 2:59:06 PM PDT by Alter Kaker (Gravitation is a theory, not a fact. It should be approached with an open mind...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

Sorry, I don’t get it. Why make that many lives and that much property an open target for terrorists? Plus, all it takes is a couple of reports of terrorist threats on the building and no one will want to buy property there- sending property values way down. I wouldn’t invest in property there.


4 posted on 04/20/2007 2:59:41 PM PDT by MittFan08 (Anybody but McCain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JRios1968

The NIFHI has found a new home!!!


5 posted on 04/20/2007 3:00:53 PM PDT by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MittFan08

So don’t build it and let the terrorists win?


6 posted on 04/20/2007 3:01:20 PM PDT by Alter Kaker (Gravitation is a theory, not a fact. It should be approached with an open mind...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker

Nice!


7 posted on 04/20/2007 3:01:26 PM PDT by eastsider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

All it needs is a big bull’s eye for next 9/11.


8 posted on 04/20/2007 3:02:18 PM PDT by mtbopfuyn (I think the border is kind of an artificial barrier - San Antonio councilwoman Patti Radle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MittFan08
Why make that many lives and that much property an open target for terrorists?

Yes, but it takes pressure off the Sears Tower.
9 posted on 04/20/2007 3:02:57 PM PDT by sittnick (There is no salvation in politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker

“So don’t build it and let the terrorists win?”

Terrorists win if we have to tear down a building or something already built. They don’t win by us refusing to build them a juicy target to aim at. It’s not like there’s been some public clamor for bigger skyscrapers in the US that I’m aware of.


10 posted on 04/20/2007 3:04:11 PM PDT by MittFan08 (Anybody but McCain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

Who’s gonna work above the tenth floor?


11 posted on 04/20/2007 3:04:13 PM PDT by Beckwith (dhimmicrats and the liberal media have chosen sides -- Islamofascism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

The Freedom Tower is going to be 1,776 feet tall...


12 posted on 04/20/2007 3:04:23 PM PDT by wastedyears (To a liberal, "feeling safe" is far more important than "being safe" Credit to TruthShallSetYouFree)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

Liberals will say don’t build it, it will only be a target, we don’t want to anger them with ostentatious buildings that might offend them.

Why all the confusion over the WTC, re-build it and add the top or bottom floor for a memorial.


13 posted on 04/20/2007 3:04:45 PM PDT by word_warrior_bob (You can now see my amazing doggie and new puppy on my homepage!! Come say hello to Jake & Sonny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: word_warrior_bob
Why all the confusion over the WTC, re-build it and add the top or bottom floor for a memorial.

I agree. Often the best solution is a simple one.

14 posted on 04/20/2007 3:05:48 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican (Everyone that doesn't like what America and President Bush has done for Iraq can all go to HELL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: MittFan08

No actually if we chose not to build buildings we want/ need because of the fear of terrorists they indeed do win. There might not be a public clamor but in core business cities there’s a general need for more floor space than the ground can provide. That’s why tall buildings exist in the first place. Chicago is a big city with a lot of money moving around, even though there is surrounding area it could expand into horizontally (though it would have to take over some burbs to get to most of it) that land is all away from the city center, the city center is a high value real estate area.


15 posted on 04/20/2007 3:07:45 PM PDT by discostu (only things a western savage understands are whiskey and rifles and an unarmed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MittFan08; sittnick; MinorityRepublican
Sorry, I don’t get it. Why make that many lives and that much property an open target for terrorists? Plus, all it takes is a couple of reports of terrorist threats on the building and no one will want to buy property there- sending property values way down. I wouldn’t invest in property there.

Maybe Target should build a world record sky scaper and put their logo on it.

16 posted on 04/20/2007 3:08:36 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Beckwith
Who’s gonna work above the tenth floor?

Me. I work on the 37th floor, directly west of the spire building. The view is absolutely beautiful up here, especially during a thunderstorm or sunset.

17 posted on 04/20/2007 3:11:18 PM PDT by Rollee (Maybe the only purpose of your life is to serve as a warning to others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: discostu

Actually, as long as private money is spent on this project I say let them do what they want to do. Anyone who wants to live there can do so- they know the risks.

I’m just saying I wouldn’t invest my money in the project because I know that all it would take is news of some plot to bring down the building and property values would start plummeting.

But hey, if the developer wants to take the risk and people want to live there then it’s ok with me.


18 posted on 04/20/2007 3:12:08 PM PDT by MittFan08 (Anybody but McCain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Beckwith
I'll work above the 100th floor. Screw'm all.
19 posted on 04/20/2007 3:12:28 PM PDT by HEY4QDEMS (Sarchasm: The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: word_warrior_bob

No, the problem is that the WTC was a lousy complex. It was ugly (the plaza was just awful), and it was an incredibly expensive and inefficient use of space and never profitable.


20 posted on 04/20/2007 3:13:12 PM PDT by Alter Kaker (Gravitation is a theory, not a fact. It should be approached with an open mind...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson