Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mia T
“You are neglecting to include Rudy’s crossover appeal in your calculation.”

It’s not really crossover when you ask one rather large part of the base to let go of their most important issue.

Rather, it’s thumbing your nose in the face of the pro-lifers.

There are not enough “moderates” to compensate for the pro-lifers who simply will not vote for Rudy.

On top of that, he will absolutely destroy the party on a national level.

If I remember right, you pushed for Jeanine Pirro against Hillary with the same persistence. Remind us of how successful that was.

108 posted on 04/20/2007 5:08:09 AM PDT by Preachin' (Enoch's testimony was that he pleased God: Why are we still here?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: Preachin'
I concede Pirro was a disappointment. She ultimately chose political viability over mounting a real challenge to clinton.

But OTOH, what did Spencer get us? What could be mischaracterized by the clinton agitprop machine as a 'landslide.' (A HILLARY 'LANDSLIDE'??? NOT SO FAST, MISSUS CLINTON....)

We need someone who has the street smarts and organization to take on the clintons.

112 posted on 04/20/2007 5:20:38 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson