Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mia T

Let me see if I’ve got this straight. If paleo-conservatives don’t drop their candidates whom the “center” won’t support because they disagree with their positions and support a candidate whose positions we don’t agree with, we will be responsible for the Clintons election. But, the “center” won’t be responsible if they refuse to vote for our candidate should our candidate win the nomination. We will be responsible if we either nominate a non-center candidate or refuse to support a center candidate should said center candidate win the nomination. Okay, I think I’ve got the picture.


104 posted on 04/20/2007 4:39:25 AM PDT by fewz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: fewz

You actually got the following things wrong:

1- This problem is not ‘center’ v right. It is not immoral (or amoral) vs moral. It is rational vs irrational.

2- Unlike the Rudy haters, most, if not all, of those supporting Rudy will support WHICHEVER Republican is nominated.

Unlike the Rudy haters, we understand that the alternative to ANY Republican is a danger to ALL our babies, the living, the unborn, the not yet even imagined. Unlike the Rudy haters, we are the ones who are TRULY PRO-LIFE.


106 posted on 04/20/2007 4:55:36 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson