You actually got the following things wrong:
1- This problem is not ‘center’ v right. It is not immoral (or amoral) vs moral. It is rational vs irrational.
2- Unlike the Rudy haters, most, if not all, of those supporting Rudy will support WHICHEVER Republican is nominated.
Unlike the Rudy haters, we understand that the alternative to ANY Republican is a danger to ALL our babies, the living, the unborn, the not yet even imagined. Unlike the Rudy haters, we are the ones who are TRULY PRO-LIFE.
Rudy has a 100% approval rating with NARAL, his rating is even higher than Hillary Clinton's. It is totally disingenuous and pure spin, to say that a vote for Rudy is Pro Life.
Babies in New York were never safe under Rudy and they will not be safe now. Rudy goes even farther by wanting taxpayer funded abortions.
Fear of Hillary is more like panic for some. So much so, people are willing to vote for someone who has claimed his policies are like that of Bill Clintons.
Rudy will divide and bring down the GOP, those that pushed him will be most responsible if a Democrat wins.
All kidding aside, there are at least 3 people that I like better than Rudy but if Rudy ends up with the nomination, I will vote for him. I just think it’s a bit early to be making the arguments that you are making.
You’re right, of course, should Giuliani win the nomination we must support him. Any democratic alternative is much, much, worse.
It is to me.
It is rational vs irrational.
And is it rational to obsess constantly about Hillary?
Unlike the Rudy haters, we are the ones who are TRULY PRO-LIFE.
That's ridiculous.
Your phobia of Hillary has made you irrational, IMO.