Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/19/2007 5:26:12 AM PDT by areafiftyone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Blackirish; Jameison; Sabramerican; BunnySlippers; tkathy; veronica; Roccus; Jake The Goose; ...

((((RUDY PING)))))


2 posted on 04/19/2007 5:28:34 AM PDT by areafiftyone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Norman Bates

(((((PING)))))


3 posted on 04/19/2007 5:29:20 AM PDT by areafiftyone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: zook; TitansAFC; therut; zbigreddogz; Laissez-faire capitalist; areafiftyone; PhilCollins; ...
The McCain List.
Common sense conservatism


Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting
4 posted on 04/19/2007 5:38:55 AM PDT by Norman Bates (Happy Easter!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone

Way too early ... and Fred Thompson isn’t in yet ...


15 posted on 04/19/2007 5:53:34 AM PDT by sono (TITUS PVLLO in MMVIII - Paid for by the Aventine Collegium)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone

Okay so the poll favors those two. Which Republicans are ahead?


27 posted on 04/19/2007 6:26:23 AM PDT by SmoothTalker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone; TommyDale; Liz
Oh sheesh, how low can you go.
Now you're posting polls that include a total of 38 people.

And since Rudy and McCane 'tied' with 22%, that means they each got EIGHT votes. EIGHT VOTES!!! And this is news???

I could take poll at a bar with more people and get 100% for Hunter or Fred Thompson. This 'poll' is useless spam.

And I sure hope you're ponying up BIG TIME in the FReepathon for eating all this bandwidth with your spam.

An aside, you 'lost' someone from your Rudy PING list yesterday...

To: writeblock

This is a conservative site. Buh bye troll.

124 posted on 04/18/2007 1:33:42 PM CDT by Jim Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]

Personally I'd heed the words of the 'BIG HE'.

30 posted on 04/19/2007 6:32:34 AM PDT by Condor51 (Rudy makes John Kerry look like a Right Wing 'Gun Nut' Extremist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone

I am “almost” willing to bet that Virginia will vote a majority for the rat that runs in ‘08.

LLS


38 posted on 04/19/2007 6:48:22 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (Preserve America... kill terrorists... destroy dims!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone

Our Virginia county party refuses to take a straw poll on the presidential race. We won’t get sucked into the divisiveness. OK, so I asked them to do one, so it’s not me. I thought it would be cool to make national headlines for our committee, and maybe get one of the candidates to try to “woo” us.


42 posted on 04/19/2007 10:14:42 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone

I liked their “38 participants”. We have twice that show up for our normal meetings, and a lot more when there is something important to vote on. With 38 voters, that means the “22%” was 8.36 votes. Love to know how they did that. 8 would be 21%, 7 would be 18%.

So it’s like they had 8 Rudy, 8 McCain, and 7 Gingrich. But since their percentages don’t match those numbers, I don’t know WHAT they actually did.


43 posted on 04/19/2007 10:17:59 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone

Looking more at the numbers:

8 - Rudy (21%) (article: 22%)
8 - McCain (21%) (article: 22%)
7 - Gingrich (18%) (article: 17%)
7 - Gilmore (18%) (article: 17%)
5 - Romney (13%) (article: 12%)
1 - Thompson (3%) (a: 3%)
1 - Hunter (3%) (a: 3%)
1 - Huckabee (3%) (a:3%)


38, 100%, (article: 99%)

If you ever needed a sign that we started this election campaign too soon, there it is. We are reporting what 38 people living in a town that isn’t even the biggest city in 20 miles of itself think about next year’s primary.


44 posted on 04/19/2007 10:25:38 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone

Lets be realistic here, from a pure statistical standpoint, any sample size less than 40 is not considered to be representative of a population.


46 posted on 04/19/2007 11:36:05 AM PDT by Ayal Rosenthal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson