((((RUDY PING)))))
(((((PING)))))
Way too early ... and Fred Thompson isn’t in yet ...
Okay so the poll favors those two. Which Republicans are ahead?
And since Rudy and McCane 'tied' with 22%, that means they each got EIGHT votes. EIGHT VOTES!!! And this is news???
I could take poll at a bar with more people and get 100% for Hunter or Fred Thompson. This 'poll' is useless spam.
And I sure hope you're ponying up BIG TIME in the FReepathon for eating all this bandwidth with your spam.
An aside, you 'lost' someone from your Rudy PING list yesterday...
To: writeblockThis is a conservative site. Buh bye troll.
124 posted on 04/18/2007 1:33:42 PM CDT by Jim Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]
Personally I'd heed the words of the 'BIG HE'.
I am “almost” willing to bet that Virginia will vote a majority for the rat that runs in ‘08.
LLS
Our Virginia county party refuses to take a straw poll on the presidential race. We won’t get sucked into the divisiveness. OK, so I asked them to do one, so it’s not me. I thought it would be cool to make national headlines for our committee, and maybe get one of the candidates to try to “woo” us.
I liked their “38 participants”. We have twice that show up for our normal meetings, and a lot more when there is something important to vote on. With 38 voters, that means the “22%” was 8.36 votes. Love to know how they did that. 8 would be 21%, 7 would be 18%.
So it’s like they had 8 Rudy, 8 McCain, and 7 Gingrich. But since their percentages don’t match those numbers, I don’t know WHAT they actually did.
Looking more at the numbers:
8 - Rudy (21%) (article: 22%)
8 - McCain (21%) (article: 22%)
7 - Gingrich (18%) (article: 17%)
7 - Gilmore (18%) (article: 17%)
5 - Romney (13%) (article: 12%)
1 - Thompson (3%) (a: 3%)
1 - Hunter (3%) (a: 3%)
1 - Huckabee (3%) (a:3%)
If you ever needed a sign that we started this election campaign too soon, there it is. We are reporting what 38 people living in a town that isn’t even the biggest city in 20 miles of itself think about next year’s primary.
Lets be realistic here, from a pure statistical standpoint, any sample size less than 40 is not considered to be representative of a population.