Replies

If it were to come down to a choice between Hitlery or a “moderate”... how do you vote?

I'm willing to vote for a social moderate (Romney) but not a morally bankrupt RINO (Giuliani).

It's simple if the Republicans want my vote, then they will choose wisely in the primary. If they fail to choose their own leader wisely, then they will suffer the consequences in November 2008. I am letting it be known early and often that Rudy is not acceptable to me or to the millions of solid evangelical and pro-life catholics who are similarly inclined. Rudy cannot win without the Pro-Life Catholic and pro-life evangelical vote. It might only amount to a shift of two or three million votes, but I suspect that if we refuse to cow-tow to the RINO's who are no better than the democrats in shoving morals aside in order to consolidate power, then we, as a people, are not worthy of a great president. We will get the government we deserve come next November. Choose wisely in the primaries.

Try to be realistic in your answer.

The MSN has sold all of us on the idea that only Rudy can win. The reality is that Rudy simply can't win. He will not get my vote in either in the primaries or the general election. If he can win without me, then more power to him. But I will not be casting my vote for him to obtain that power.

You are speaking to a PRO-LIFE forever, charismatic Catholic who is more evangelical than most evangelical. I WILL vote for Rudy over Hitlery or O’Dumbo if Rudy is nominated, and I believe that most of the other 2-3 million voters you aver you speak for would join me in doing so... since we KNOW that Ginsberg and Stevens would be gone immediately.

I categorically don’t believe that only Rudy can win ... I think most of the well mentioned Reps have at least a decent chance to beat Hitlery, and “electability” will not play into my decision for the nomination. It WILL play a part of how I choose to vote in the general, though.