Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: woodbutcher
The question is whether persons in charge could have done something to prevent the second crime.

Lets see, two people are shot to death in a school, lack of gun at the scene met no murder suicide, meaning the murderer was on the loose, with a gun.

There should have been a an immediate, massive police presence at that school.

224 posted on 04/17/2007 4:20:42 PM PDT by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 221 | View Replies ]


To: dragnet2

> There should have been a an immediate, massive police
> presence at that school.

Even without that, there should have been a warning to the campus community that murder had been committed and the killer was not apprehended, along with the usual boilerplate about vigilance concerning suspicious activity, etc, etc. And it shouldn’t just have been an e-mail 2 hours later.


225 posted on 04/17/2007 4:24:15 PM PDT by socrates_shoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies ]

To: dragnet2

There should have been a an immediate, massive police presence at that school.
_______________________________________

What is the population of your home town?


236 posted on 04/17/2007 5:57:42 PM PDT by woodbutcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson