To: ExSoldier
Just heard the shooter has been described as ASIAN looking. They don't know if if he was a student or not. There is also some conflict in these reports. TWO incidents. ONE SHOOTER (declared) but the cops are saying there is no evidence yet to declare the incidents are linked? Watch out. If this was a case of Sudden Jihad Syndrome, it will be covered up, especially if there was really more than one shooter and one or more got away. If this was a planned attack by a terror cell this could just be the first in a series.... Various terrorism groups have recently warned that they are going after our schools.
685 posted on
04/16/2007 9:48:56 AM PDT by
Lazamataz
(Can’t the liberals start their own countries somewhere, and then surrender?)
To: Lazamataz
I saw the same warning.
I did notice a number of uniformed ROTC students. Wonder if that had anything to do with it. Just wondering at this point.
700 posted on
04/16/2007 9:51:36 AM PDT by
milford421
(U.N. OUT OF U.S.)
To: Lazamataz
The reason I don’t think today’s massacre is terrorism: a terrorist wouldn’t stop up at the President’s office to kill him first, and then go after students (if indeed there is only one shooter).
Moving around takes time. If he was looking for maximum victims, he would have started in classrooms and stayed in classrooms, not started in the administration wing, begin a shooting there, which then launched a manhunt (much, much) earlier than would have been done if he started with and focused on only classrooms.
Make any sense?
728 posted on
04/16/2007 9:57:29 AM PDT by
jdm
To: Lazamataz
The reason I don’t think today’s massacre is terrorism: a terrorist wouldn’t stop up at the President’s office to kill him first, and then go after students (if indeed there is only one shooter).
Moving around takes time. If he was looking for maximum victims, he would have started in classrooms and stayed in classrooms, not started in the administration wing, begin a shooting there, which then launched a manhunt (much, much) earlier than would have been done if he started with and focused on only classrooms.
Make any sense?
735 posted on
04/16/2007 9:58:29 AM PDT by
jdm
To: Lazamataz
THANKS FOR POSTING THAT AND FOR DOING SO IN BIG RED LETTERS.
VERY IMPORTANT, IMHO.
I expect multiple BESLENS here.
921 posted on
04/16/2007 10:32:50 AM PDT by
Quix
(GOD ALONE IS GOD; WORTHY; PAID THE PRICE; IS COMING AGAIN; KNOWS ALL; IS LOVING; IS ALTOGETHER GOOD!)
To: Lazamataz
Good post. Virginia schools are one of the plans that they have drawing of (see my post #709)
To: Lazamataz
Even if this is not a jihadi event, I think we would be safe to assume they are studying response patterns and will study the security enhancements which will follow.
1,729 posted on
04/16/2007 1:09:44 PM PDT by
Smokin' Joe
(How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
To: Lazamataz
We’ve been here before. Later today or tomorrow,they will announce it wasn’t terrorism.
2,182 posted on
04/16/2007 2:21:23 PM PDT by
floriduh voter
(Join Terri's Legacy List Contact: 8mmmauser)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson