[Mia T]

There is only one thing electorally each of us really controls, and that is our own vote.

If, in this 2-party system of ours, you normally vote R and you instead vote 3rd party, or stay home, you are helping to elect the D. You are deluding yourself if you think otherwise.

To be specific, if it’s Rudy Giuliani vs. hillary clinton in ‘08, you will help to elect hillary clinton.

Because you won’t vote for the ‘liberal’ who will appoint strict constructionist judges, you will help to elect the Stalinist who will surely appoint pro-abortionists to the bench, and who will pick up where she left off decimating the Constitution, betraying our country and losing the war.

Good going.

[Liz]

Your nonsensical ravings have no revelance whatsoever to important conservative values emphasized by this web site.

Your willingness to exist in a total moral and intellectual vacuum is deeply offensive.

I am not interested in anything you might have to say.

Do not ever post to me again.

[Cicero]

You pose the alternatives starkly, which is why at this point we have to hope that Giuliani does not win the nomination.

A choice between a corrupt, Communist, powerdrunk, mob-related witch and an extreme pro-abort Republican. Not a choice we want to be confronted with in November 2008.

I could never vote for hillary, but at this point I don’t believe I can ever vote for Giuliani, either. He is burning all of his bridges on the abortion issue. It took thirty years or more to move the national Republican party half way out of the Rockefeller camp into the conservative camp, dragging their feet every inch of the way, and if we elect a pro-abortion Republican all of that will be undone and we’ll have to start all over again.

Is that worse than electing Stalinette as president? I honestly don’t know. I can’t vote for either one of them. I hope the Republican Party realizes that and comes to its senses before it’s too late and we are confronted with such an impossible choice.

[mysterio]

If, in this 2-party system of ours, you normally vote R and you instead vote 3rd party, or stay home, you are helping to elect the D.

BS. If Ds are running under both party flags, YOU are electing the D by running one.

[WhyisaTexasgirlinPA]

And we keep telling you Rudy supporters that his definition of strict constructionist judges is they can decide either way. He has no litmus test. So, how can you determine he will nominate conservative judges when he has already said he has no litmus test for them?

We don't see any difference in hillary or rudy -

[ellery]

If you know that some social and libertarian conservatives won’t vote for him (because they’ve repeatedly told you so), and you acknowledge that Rudy can’t win without these votes, then you’re admitting that Rudy is unelectable. If you vote for him in the primaries despite the previous facts, then it’s your vote that will give the donks the presidency.

[Mr. Silverback]

Because you won’t vote for the ‘liberal’ who will appoint strict constructionist judges, you will help to elect the Stalinist who will surely appoint pro-abortionists to the bench, and who will pick up where she left off decimating the Constitution, betraying our country and losing the war.

I know this will sound over the top, but I am really, really tired of hearing this crap.

Pay attention to this question please: WHAT FREAKIN MONTH IS IT? BECAUSE i AIN'T SEEIN' OCTOBER OF 2008 ON MY CALENDAR. IT'S FREAKIN APRIL OF '07! gOT IT? APRIL. OF . 2007.

Supporting a liberal in the primaries is selling out. So unless you're in a time warp, cram the lectures.