Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mia T
Rudy has explicitly defined what he means by the term:

"-I think a strict construction would be probably the way I describe it."- Rudy

He thinks 'strict constructionist' would be "PROBABLY" the way he describes it!?

Sorry,but that's neither explicit nor confidence inspiring.

178 posted on 04/17/2007 7:39:19 AM PDT by airborne (Freedom is worth fighting for !! And I'm in a fighting mood !! HUNTER 2008 !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies ]


To: airborne

His definition of the concept WAS explicit. Then he went on to NAME the concept. The way I heard it then, the way I now read it now, he was simply trying not to sound pedantic when invoking the legal jargon.


179 posted on 04/17/2007 7:57:38 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson