His definition of the concept WAS explicit. Then he went on to NAME the concept. The way I heard it then, the way I now read it now, he was simply trying not to sound pedantic when invoking the legal jargon.
I guess we just see it differently.
I always am suspicious when a politician speaks, especially one who is a lawyer.
That, plus the fact that I do not like Rudy’s many liberal leaning social positions, tends to make me even more skeptical when he tells me how conservative he is going to be.
Sorry, ‘MiaT’, but he raises a lot of red flags for me.
Now, about that question. Care to give me a YES or NO answer? Or not.