The answer is implicit in my prior post. Why do you suppose I added this qualifier, ‘unless Rudy plans to nominate himself’ ?
As for concerns, only a fool wouldn’t have any. Perfection is hard to come by, especially in the professional political class, a self-selected subgroup that is mediocre, power-hungry and corrupt or corruptible by definition.
I was looking for something a little more straight forwasrd.
Like "YES" or "NO".
But I understand your reluctance to answer my question that way.
Why do you suppose I added this qualifier,‘unless Rudy plans to nominate himself’...
Because you didn't want to answer the question directly?