Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mia T
The answer is implicit in my prior post.

I was looking for something a little more straight forwasrd.

Like "YES" or "NO".

But I understand your reluctance to answer my question that way.

Why do you suppose I added this qualifier,‘unless Rudy plans to nominate himself’...

Because you didn't want to answer the question directly?

177 posted on 04/17/2007 7:31:31 AM PDT by airborne (Freedom is worth fighting for !! And I'm in a fighting mood !! HUNTER 2008 !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies ]


To: airborne

A ‘yes’ or a ‘no’ would have been so one-dimensional. ;)

OTOH, my answer not only answered your question, it underscored the absurdity of the underlying premise riddling this thread, namely, that the unborn is at increased risk under a Giuliani presidency.

The only person in this scenario who is putting the unborn (and the born and the not yet even imagined) at risk is the person who will place his de facto vote for hillary clinton.


181 posted on 04/17/2007 8:15:36 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson