I’ve already heard that, and it doesn’t ease my concerns.
Now, could you please answer the question?
“Do you personally think that a judge who is, by definition, a “strict constructionist”, believes that the Constitution allows for federal funding of abortions?”
The answer is implicit in my prior post. Why do you suppose I added this qualifier, ‘unless Rudy plans to nominate himself’ ?
As for concerns, only a fool wouldn’t have any. Perfection is hard to come by, especially in the professional political class, a self-selected subgroup that is mediocre, power-hungry and corrupt or corruptible by definition.
the constitution neither allows, nor excludes anything regarding abortion.
Roe will go because its bad constitutional reasoning, and for only that reason, not because tossing it represents any moral opinion regarding abortion.