I'm gonna remember that one!
Posted on 04/12/2007 6:05:36 AM PDT by NYC Republican
HER name is Crystal Gail Man gum. She is the woman who falsely accused three Duke University students of rape. Yesterday, the attorney general of North Carolina came forward and flatly declared the three young men "innocent of these charges." That means their accuser is a liar. Her name is Crystal Gail Mangum. It is the policy of the news media not to publish the names of rape accusers on the grounds that they should not have to fear public shame for coming forward with word of a horrifying personal violation. That is a noble policy. But it needs a codicil. The codicil is that if a rape accuser is revealed as a liar, her name should be spoken loudly and often - as loudly and often as the names of those whom she falsely accused have been over the past year. Her name is Crystal Gail Mangum. She must be denied anonymity because she makes a mockery of the very policy of granting anonymity to rape accusers. We do not publish their names so that they will not fear public exposure. But people who are tempted to do the monstrous thing Mangum did should fear public exposure.
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
The question is: why?
Somebody is being protected. Somebody with power, apparently. It's not Crystal.
Ask the LAX Duke Team, there that night. Their stories pan out with time-line and evidence, pics, cab drivers, witnesses, atm surveillance cameras/recipt. Her's never did.
That distinguished group of scholars may have had other methods of play in mind
Very soon after the "recent unpleasantness", a bunch of we, ad hominemed as "hooligans" by the academic elite of 88 at Duke, pulled up dimensions of the house the alleged rape/sodomy/mouth rape/choking went on. The wee size of the bathroom (location of alleged abuse) would make potty training of a tot a difficult task.
And we "hooligans" knew some in the media were watching the evidence and facts we brought to bear on this case; and yet, they remained in denial. Were they fearful of "Shabazz"-type riots at the workplace? Fearful of knife-wielding and oral-sniping abusive feminists should evidence/facts be printed in a newspaper?
And the print media, including the "visual media", cannot yet understand why their ratings plummet?
They can be activists for minorities, for women, for Democrats, for liberals -- somehow this secular humanities agenda is okay and probably because it's massively promoted in all institutes of public education.
But simple facts? Dimensions of the bathroom? Photos? Suddenly declared OFF-LIMITS IN THE "NAME OF SOCIAL JUSTICE."
"Social Justice" has been clearly shown -- to the US and the world - that Social Justice is a lie created by socialists, for socialists, and against anyone who isn't one of their own.
Their words about "loving" diversity have been shown as a lie. And "multi-culturalism"? Duke University showed itself as giving lip-service to; but denying fairness to three young men -- in the name of "social justice" and fear of "social justice lawsuiting".
Egads, we went digging through cyber graveyards pulling up data. We dug through financial records. We perservered and bore through every single newer liar and lie, and aspersion-casting by Socialists.
This declaration of innocence yesterday by Attorney Cooper, wasn't just a win for three wrongly accused young men; but it was a victory for simple people like me who uphold justice; not as a quota'd, partisan "tool" for political advancements.
The real racists were those who activized, sans or even with the facts and evidence FOR a black woman, because she was "black."
The real hateful sexists were those who activized, sans or even with the facts and evidence for a woman, because she was a "woman".
The real hateful class warfare mongers were those who activized, sans or even with the facts and evidence for a "poverty" figure, because she was "poor".
Not a single one of these gave a damned about Crystal, the human. But only that she was useful for their OWN ideologies and "truth to power" schematics and master agenda.
I don't think it gets a whole lot more hateful than this. They were hateful to Crystal. Not helpful.
Her family, OTOH, did what families do in such a circumstance -- they stood by her.
But those who encouraged the lens of sex, skin color, money to be the larger focus in this case -- need to look in the mirror and face their own hate. It was they who depersonalized Crystal. Just as Crystal did to three innocent men at Duke.
I know.
Bad habit of mine though.
Well, the local TV stations are using her name; and they have finally investigated and she is NOT a registered student at NCSU.
Excuse me? The players had specifically asked for white girls. When the "hideous things" showed up that was what started the "disagreements" they had.
You haven't been following this case, have you?
Now them thar are LIPS baby! I mean them thar are LIPS!!
You forgot to mention that she gave them all the clap!
I'm gonna remember that one!
Rush is giving "spot-on" analysis of the fiasco right now.
When I was a freshman in college, I pledged a fraternity my first semester. At the end of that semester I de-pledged, in part because I couldn’t keep up with the drinking schedule. Now, I’m a man who later served as the president of a beer club for 3 years. I have a deep and broad appreciation for the stuff. But I am also sensible, and my general impression of fraternities is that the pace of drinking among them is beyond frenetic (except for Farmhouse Fraternity...they only allowed milk).
You mean that she wasn’t a registered student at NCCU last year on March 13, 2006?
What about all that honor student crap?
But if you take her to the Champagne Room, she will. What a skank.
If I am not mistaken, Steve Pagones (one of the “rapists” named by Al Sharpton), who was a police officer or DA, sued Rev. Al and got a default judgment. I think he is still trying to collect it. I have read this his efforts make for some interesting theater as Rev. Al claims his suits, watches, etc., are “owned” by his foundation and that he only has “use” of them.
Interesting information. Yes, I’m sure the very holy “Reverend Al” uses every possible loophole to avoid liens or taxation of his foundation’s assets.
Infuriating!!!!!!!!!! The bible is very clear on what should happen to her!!
They’re just saying she’s not registered, nothing further.
She is a barf bag.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.