Posted on 04/04/2007 12:15:19 PM PDT by Brilliant
TEHRAN, Iran - President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, in a surprise move that defused escalating tension in the Middle East, announced the release of 15 captive British sailors and marines Wednesday in what he called an Easter gift to the British people.
Prime Minister Tony Blair, who said the Britons had been released, added that he bore "no ill will" toward the Iranian people following the 13-day standoff.
The breakthrough eased tensions that have been increasing steadily, raising fears of military conflict in the volatile region and prompting a spike in oil prices. It suggested that Iran's hard-line leadership had decided Tehran had demonstrated its strength in the standoff but did not want to push the crisis too far.
Despite the announcement, however, the crew members had not arrived at the British Embassy as of 9 p.m local time in Tehran.
Alex Pinfield, first secretary of embassy in Tehran, said it's not clear when they would be handed over or where they are going to spend the night. He indicated the British "are still discussing the Iranian case with the Iranian Foreign Ministry."
Asked about apparent contradictions over Blair saying the crew had been freed and British Embassy statements that they had not yet been handed over to British authorities, a Downing Street spokesman would only say "the process is under way."
Iranian state television showed the 14 men and one woman meeting with Ahmadinejad outside the presidential palace following his announcement at a news conference that they were being freed. The crew members were seized while on patrol in the northern Persian Gulf on March 23, would leave Iran on Thursday.
At the news conference, Ahmadinejad pinned a medal on the chest of the Iranian coast guard commander who intercepted the sailors and marines, then made the dramatic announcement.
"On the occasion of the birthday of the great prophet (Muhammad) ... and for the occasion of the passing of Christ, I say the Islamic Republic government and the Iranian people — with all powers and legal right to put the soldiers on trial — forgave those 15," he said, referring to the Muslim prophet's birthday on March 30 and the Easter holiday.
"This pardon is a gift to the British people," he said.
The standoff between London and Tehran began when the crew was seized as it searched for smugglers off the Iraqi coast. Britain denied Iranian claims the crew had entered Iranian waters.
"I'm glad that our 15 service personnel have been released and I know their release will come as a relief not just to them but to their families," Blair said outside his No. 10 Downing St. office. "Throughout, we have taken a measured approach, firm but calm, not negotiating but not confronting, either."
Blair added, "To the Iranian people, I would simply say this: We bear you no ill will."
President Bush, who had condemned the seizure and referred to the captives as "hostages," also welcomed the news, said his national security spokesman, Gordon Johndroe.
Blair thanked British allies in Europe, the U.N. Security Council and in the Middle East for their help in securing the freedom of the Royal Navy personnel.
Syria's information and foreign ministers said Damascus had played a key role.
"Syria exercised a sort of quiet diplomacy to solve this problem and encourage dialogue between the two parties," Foreign Minister Walid al-Moallem said.
After Ahmadinejad's news conference, state television showed him meeting with the British crew, who were dressed in business suits, outside the presidential palace. He shook hands and chatted with them through a translator, and a caption to the video said the meeting was taking place as part of the "process of release."
"We appreciate it. Your people have been really kind to us, and we appreciate it very much," one of the crew could be heard telling Ahmadinejad in English.
Another said: "We are grateful for your forgiveness."
Ahmadinejad responded in Farsi, "You are welcome."
Among the crew at the palace was sailor Faye Turney, the sole woman among the captives, wearing a blue jacket and floral-patterned blue and white headscarf.
Iranian TV said the British captives had watched Ahmadinejad's news conference live and were ecstatic when a translator told them what the president had said.
British Defense Secretary Des Browne said they had acted with dignity during their captivity.
"It is vital that we get them back home quickly and safely so they can be reunited with their families and loved ones — that is our priority now," he said.
Recent days saw talk of direct negotiations between Britain and Iran, and a decrease in tensions that had risen after Iran broadcast videos in which Turney and the others "confessed" to violating Iranian territorial waters, and Britain expressed outrage.
Ahmadinejad said London had sent a letter to the Iranian Foreign Ministry pledging that entering Iranian waters "will not happen again."
The British Foreign Office responded: "We haven't gone into detail of what was in the note. But we have said all along we made our position clear (about being in Iraqi waters)."
The crew would be handed over to British diplomats in Tehran and that it would then be up to the Foreign Office to decide how they would return home, said an Iranian official in London who spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the negotiations.
They will leave Tehran early Thursday and arrive at Heathrow around 11 a.m. (8 a.m. EDT), said Robin Air, father of Royal Marine Capt. Chris Air. Families will be reunited with the crew later in the day at a military base, he said.
Ahmadinejad said Iran will never accept trespassing in its territorial waters.
"On behalf of the great Iranian people, I want to thank the Iranian coast guard who courageously defended and captured those who violated their territorial waters," he said in awarding a medal to the coast guard commander.
"We are sorry that British troops remain in Iraq and their sailors are being arrested in Iran," Ahmadinejad said.
Ahmadinejad asked Blair not to "punish" the crew for confessing that they had been in Iranian waters when they were seized. Iran broadcast video of some of them giving confessions, angering Britain.
He also criticized Britain for deploying Turney in the Gulf.
"How can you justify seeing a mother away from her home, her children? Why don't they respect family values in the West?" he asked.
Ahmadinejad's announcement came after Iran's official Islamic Republic News Agency reported that an Iranian envoy would be allowed to meet five Iranians detained by U.S. forces in northern Iraq. Another Iranian diplomat, separately seized two months ago by uniformed gunmen in Iraq, was released and returned Tuesday to Tehran.
A U.S. military spokesman in Baghdad said, however, that American authorities were still considering the request. The spokesman, Maj. Gen. William C. Caldwell, said an international Red Cross team, including an Iranian, had visited the prisoners but he did not say when.
Iran has denied it seized the Britons to force the release of Iranians held in Iraq, and Britain has steadfastly insisted it would not negotiate.
Iraqi Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari told The Associated Press that the case of the five Iranians detained in Irbil, the capital of the Kurdish self-governing region in northern Iraq, had no connection with the British captives.
Zebari, a Kurd, said his government had been relaying Iranian requests for a meeting with the five detainees, but could not confirm the request had been approved.
In a commentary, IRNA said the movement on the Iranian prisoner issue was due in part to "the new American political and military appointments in Iraq."
The agency was referring to Gen. David Petraeus, who took command of U.S. forces in February, and Ryan Crocker, who began work as the new U.S. ambassador to Iraq in March.
U.S. troops detained the Iranians on Jan. 11, accusing them of links to an Iranian Revolutionary Guard network that was supplying money and weapons to insurgents in Iraq.
Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said Bush had approved the strategy of raiding Iranian targets in Iraq as part of efforts to confront Tehran.
Iraqi Kurds, like the country's Shiites, maintain close ties with Shiite-dominated Iran, despite their warm relationship with the U.S. — and have been upset over the arrests.
Iran denounced the raid and insisted the five were diplomats who were engaged exclusively in consular work. The Iraqi government said they were arrested at an office that was supposed to become an Iranian consulate.
The British newspaper The Independent reported this week that the Irbil raid had escalated tensions between the U.S. and Iran and may have set the stage for the seizure of the British crew.
isn’t it? British Royal Marines groveling with gratitude toward this future Hittler
Or perhaps the thought of Pelosi stopping in to visit him did the trick.
Only God has the power to forgive. So it makes sense that the Iranian President would purport to do so.
Word must have gotten out that the hostage takers were CIA operatives to make the Iran government look like morons..
Blair added, “To the Iranian people, I would simply say this: We bear you no ill will.”
President Bush, who had condemned the seizure and referred to the captives as “hostages,” also welcomed the news, said his national security spokesman, Gordon Johndroe.
Were I advising President Bush, I would say to wait until the Brits are safely in friendly hands. Then issue a very clear warning to the Iranians with a concommitent general order to the fleet. The warning would state that if Iranian forces believe that American personnel or equipment has strayed into Iranian waters, they should carefully approach or vessels/personnel and verbally warn then to retreat and then they can escort those U.S. vessels or personnel to the border and then retreat. However, if they ever attempt to capture or by their actions indicate a show of force or threat thereof to U.S. vessels or personnel, they will be subject to immediate airstrikes and any and all necessary lethal force to neutralize the threat the Iranians pose. Taking of U.S. personnel as hostages will be considered a declaration of war against the United States.
To command personnel in the area, I would intruct them (general order) to be exceedingly cautious of the borders and if confronted by Iranian patrols claiming border territory violations, to get positional data immediately and then withdraw to avoid an unnecessary conflict. (the dispute can be worked out later) However, if they threaten or attempt to take U.S. hostages, the area commander WILL BE RELIEVED OF COMMAND AND COURTS-MARTIALED for violating a general order if he/she does not respond quickly with lethal force to stop Americans from being taken hostage. Short version - withdraw if possible, blow the scum to bits if it is not an option. The commanders in the area will be authorized to escalate the exchange as necessary to neutralize the threat. I.E. if destroying Iranian patrol boats results in shore to ship fire, then the shore batteries can be neutralized. If Iranian aircraft engage, they will be splashed. Any anti-aircraft fire directed towards U.S. aircraft will result in further strikes. The commander would be able to use all escalating force short of Nuclear weapons. With the promise of full presidential backing.
“How long before the Dems claim that Pelosi did some wheeling and dealing and made this happen while in Syria? And we all know the MSM will lovingly report any such rumor.”
I’m glad you mentioned this. I thought the President of the United States alone dictates foreign policy, and he/she through the secretary of state conducts diplomacy. Why can’t Rep. Pelossi not be ordered to come home or face charges of violation of the constitutions separation of powers? Will someone explain this to me? Really.
“Will someone explain this to me? Really.”
This is my guess:
First off, the Republicans have no guts. GWB is one of the few with any spine at all, but he’s lame duck. The Dems have taken Congress, and they are using the MSM to render GWB an afterthought.
The Dems/left have for some time been railing about GWB not being legitimate, (the 2000 election still haunts them). And they have been playing the victim role, claiming GWB oversteps the limits of his office, (I strongly disagree on this point). Today I saw Harry Reid making snide remarks about GWB being president, not king.
But it’s not all about the 2000 election. If the Dems can marginalize GWB, render him ineffective, while creating more problems in Iraq, then the 2008 election is in the bag for them.
That’s my take.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.