Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xsmommy

Well, it does concern me. I guess you missed my post on here (17). But these rules are being made under the nationalguidelines.org. They are being introduced to us uncrementally. Different areas at a time with different reasons for the introduction. But all have the same goal.

So, it may be in your school for the moment; but that sets a precedence for it to be introduced at mine. I am trying to understand what it is that is coming for a heads up.

The nationalguidelines.org have taken in loco parentis and made families stakeholders instead of parents.


153 posted on 03/23/2007 1:54:39 PM PDT by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies ]


To: Calpernia

well i am sorry but i do not share your concern. i don't see evil motivation on the part of the school, i see the school supporting parents in helping to keep the kids safe. if the majority of tuition paying parents are in favor of such prohibitions then i say the minority should look elsewhere for their children's education. we are paying tuition to a school precisely because we believe they share our goals and will back them up.


156 posted on 03/23/2007 2:01:59 PM PDT by xsmommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson