Federal Distortion Of Homosexual Footprint (Ignoring Early Gay Death?)
Long way from the "10%" or more usually touted by them.........
1.4% equals a LOT of perverts!
They died of AIDS.
Wow!!
At the rate that gays appear on TV shows and movies, I would have thought the number would HAVE to be 45-50%????
You can't watch a tv program for the past 20 years without discovering that everyone's dad is really a closet homosexual, and that a young girl's only true love is another young girl.
Then you have the grammar school texts and videos telling our kids that to marry the same gender and raise kids is just ducky.
Only 1.4%. Can't even say "wow that's really gay". Have to say "that might be a little bit gay".
Glad you put this in perspective. How come we tend to have more of them in Congress? Also, will the Democrats stop pandering to them now that they know the fruitcakes are a small number?
Married men live longer than single men. Will homo marriage become a health issue?
So many unanswered questions.
How can this be? My random (albeit unscientific) sample of TV programs indicates that 62 percent of the population is gay (or to be more precise, homosexual.)The other 38 (square) percent are un-cool.
Goes against the 10% Kinsey got from his random sample of male prison inmates.
What happens when this perversion isn't popular/the in-thing anymore?
Do they go back to being just plain nobodies, dullards, no claim to fame??? Maybe they are mainly composed of those who were formerly...alcoholics, over-eaters, ufo-abductees, (and/or the infinite hordes of other non-existent perverts),etc.
Just Plain D!ck
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
It's really working!
They can't reproduce.
Just 15 years ago it was over 12%...
Recruitment must be down.
Why are we allowing 1/4% of the population to control the agenda?
Write to Congress!
We need new laws!
This is unacceptable!
Wait...
According to two researchers, the largest random sex survey ever conducted has reported that only 1.4% of adults engaged in homosexual behavior.
Perhaps it's the article and not the survey (which I haven't read yet) but it seems to miss celibate homosexuals. We know from other studies plenty of those engaging in homosexual behavior consider themselves heterosexual.
Why jump to conclusions that lack of older homosexuals in the survey means they're dead? Rather, wouldn't it mean younger homosexuals are more likely to have embraced "who they are" and be performing such activity than older folks influenced by more restrictive cultural mores?
Would it matter if there are "only" 5 million homosexuals in America?
That's still a lot of sick people.
Oh, is that politically uncorrect? -sorry-
Wow---and this is in Canada, where you'd think the incidence of homosexuality would be higher than average! (DUCKING!)
Being gay is the only way a white, non jewish guy can claim victim status in this country.....I'm amazed the claims of gaydom are so few.
And to think Rudy panders to them as a way to get votes. Uhhhgg.
One-point-four percent makes them a majority if they yell loud and intimidate the other 98.6% through the media agenda, right?