Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cake_crumb
If the Brits were actually in Iraqi waters they should have every right to defend themselves from an Iranian incursion up to and including opening fire first.

The current ROE are really going to allow our forces to be sucker-punched big time one day.
182 posted on 03/23/2007 6:58:56 AM PDT by Milwaukee_Guy (Don't hit them between the eyes. Hit them right -in- the eyes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies ]


To: Milwaukee_Guy
"The current ROE are really going to allow our forces to be sucker-punched big time one day."

Well, as I understand it, standard ROE allows for the mother ship to defend her crew - if aware there's even a problem, which is where the confusion is coming in...how far offshore was she standing? - up to the use of warning shots once permission is given, then one last warning, then, if authorized. Authorization can come almost instantaneously from CINCPAC, which the ship would be immediately in touch with. Which is why I said "or new orders".

But DID the Cornwall know? Were the sailors able to contact her? Again, how far away was she standing? If she were too far she might have tried to reach the location, but the incident was over by the time she arrived. This is pure speculation obviously. There's a LOT we don't know.

209 posted on 03/23/2007 7:13:42 AM PDT by cake_crumb (When Congress prosecutes wars, you get Another Viet Nam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson