Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China says approves plan to develop large jets
Reuters ^ | 3/18/2007 | Reuters staff

Posted on 03/20/2007 12:46:40 PM PDT by Paul Ross

China says approves plan to develop large jets

Staff, Reuters News, 03/18/2007

BEIJING, March 18 (Reuters) - The Chinese cabinet has approved in principle a plan to develop the country's own large passenger jets, the government said on Sunday, in a move that could challenge the dominance of Boeing Co. (BA.N: Quote, Profile , Research) and Airbus.

The State Council, China's cabinet, has also given the go-ahead to set up a company to build the aircraft, the government said in a statement on its Web site (www.gov.cn).

"The State Council meeting believes that building large aircraft is an important, strategic policy of the Communist Party and State Council, and it has also been the wish of the entire nation for many years," the statement said. "Our country has been developing the aviation industry for 50 years, and already has the technical and material base to develop large aircraft."

The statement said the decision was taken at a cabinet meeting chaired by Premier Wen Jiabao on Feb. 26. It did not say why it had taken so long to announce.

The statement gave no other details, such as investment figures or where or when the aircraft might be made.

Industry sources told Reuters earlier this month that China's two state aircraft makers, AVIC I and AVIC II, as well as the Commission of Science Technology and Industry for National Defence, would be involved in developing the jets.

AVIC I and AVIC II, both of which make components for Airbus and Boeing, also have experience in civilian jet development and manufacturing.

AVIC I has secured more than 30 orders for its ARJ21 regional jet, scheduled for commercial operation next year, while AVIC II unit Hafei Aviation Industry Co. (600038.SS: Quote, Profile , Research) makes the ERJ-145 regional craft in partnership with Brazil's Embraer (ERJ.N: Quote, Profile , Research)(EMBR3.SA: Quote, Profile , Research).

With its air passenger traffic growing at double-digit rates in recent years, China will need about 2,650 new passenger aircraft over the next 20 years, worth $289 billion, according to the latest projections from Airbus, a unit of European aerospace group EADS (EAD.PA: Quote, Profile , Research).


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS: airbus; boeing; china; jumbos

1 posted on 03/20/2007 12:46:46 PM PDT by Paul Ross
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross

I wonder if some chinese technical people just left boeing with a raft of trade secrets. Nah.


2 posted on 03/20/2007 12:48:07 PM PDT by Mount Athos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mount Athos

They didn't have to. Al Gore probably already gave them the plans.


3 posted on 03/20/2007 12:53:49 PM PDT by RC2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross
AVIC I and AVIC II, both of which make components for Airbus and Boeing....

Airbus announced plans last fall to open a factory in China. Useful information will be learned there by the communists. Of course China was going to eventually start making their own airplanes. Anybody could have saw this coming.

4 posted on 03/20/2007 12:59:08 PM PDT by faq
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: faq

I will never enter a Chinese plane. I don't trust Chicom quality.


5 posted on 03/20/2007 1:01:09 PM PDT by SolidWood (Attack Iran NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross

The Lion does not sleep tonite.


6 posted on 03/20/2007 1:06:02 PM PDT by Branzburg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mount Athos

"The ARJ21 will be built using tooling which was originally provided by the McDonnell Douglas company for licence production of the MD-90 in China. Because of this, it bears a strong resemblance to the DC-9 series of aircraft, with an identical cabin cross section, nose profile and tail. An all new supercritical wing has been designed by Antonov.[5] It will have a sweepback of 25°, and be fitted with winglets to improve aerodynamic performance."

7 posted on 03/20/2007 1:11:39 PM PDT by Leisler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross

I can't help thinking, that these
planes are going to go the way of
the SST.

A very small niche market, that
eventually won't be able to
support the building and
maintenance of these planes, nor
their required runways.


8 posted on 03/20/2007 1:17:46 PM PDT by NickatNite2003 (From the Man from Hope" to the wife who snarls "Abandon All Hope!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leisler
Wow, a DC-9. With this acft and their chink Vostok capsule, they've got a real head start...

On 1961.
9 posted on 03/20/2007 1:21:33 PM PDT by struwwelpeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Leisler

And the ARJ21 will have a fully suite of Rockwell Collins Avionics.


10 posted on 03/20/2007 1:45:45 PM PDT by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: NickatNite2003
Could you please not post with that line wrapping like that. It really makes your posts hard to read when every line only has 5 words on it.
11 posted on 03/20/2007 1:46:55 PM PDT by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: struwwelpeter
I remember hearing from the once dominant US machine tool industry that the Japanese could not build a tool changer, or the once dominant US auto industry that they could not build a V-8 engine. The Koreans where thought in turn by the Japanese not to be able to make picture tubes.

It goes on and on, underestimating your foe is a natural human tendency.

12 posted on 03/20/2007 1:48:37 PM PDT by Last Dakotan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: struwwelpeter
Except the real technology going into this one is the wing from the Russians and the American Avionics. But that is ok, we subcontract so much stuff to Chinese companies that they are not learning much new from it.

The funny/ironic thing is THIS is the sort of thing they spend money on when congress makes noise about trade imbalances. Yeah, we get cheaply made stuff and they get airplane technology. Good call congress.
13 posted on 03/20/2007 1:49:50 PM PDT by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross; SandwicheGuy; Constitutionalist Conservative; Gator113; Zhang Fei; DanielLongo; ...
Asia pinglist

If you want on or off the list, go to the link for instructions. Otherwise, it won't be guaranteed that you will be put on or taken off (it still won't be 100% guaranteed, anyway, but will be much more highly probable).

14 posted on 03/20/2007 2:25:04 PM PDT by Jedi Master Pikachu ( What is your take on Acts 15:20 (abstaining from blood) about eating meat? Could you freepmail?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mount Athos

They got the plans & frames needed for construction and dies for some of our older model planes during the Clinton administration.

That was part of the Chinese connection with Loral and the large political donations (bribes) that occurred. Everyone forgets so fast with the rush of info coming through the computers every day.


15 posted on 03/20/2007 2:49:01 PM PDT by wildbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross
"The State Council meeting believes that building large aircraft is an important, strategic policy of the Communist Party and State Council..."

Can you say "dual-use"?
16 posted on 03/20/2007 4:07:18 PM PDT by snowrip (Liberal? YOU HAVE NO RATIONAL ARGUMENT. Actually, you lack even a legitimate excuse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson