Posted on 03/15/2007 1:01:58 PM PDT by Pharmboy
Thanks in advance for your answers...
I could easily be way wrong.
I'm not sure. I think Mars has a semi-liquid core, whereas we have a solid inner core, and a consistently liquid outer core.
I think one big difference is our big moon - it zips around us, and its gravity churns up our outer core into a nice fluid - and it's the MOVING iron that causes the field to propagate. (Think of an electric motor / generator.)
I'm not sure. I think Mars has a semi-liquid core, whereas we have a solid inner core, and a consistently liquid outer core.
I think one big difference is our big moon - it zips around us, and its gravity churns up our outer core into a nice fluid - and it's the MOVING iron that causes the field to propagate. (Think of an electric motor / generator.)
NASA to Announce 'Significant Findings' of Water on Mars Tuesday!
Space DOT com | 3-1-04 | Robert Roy Britt Senior Science Writer
Posted on 03/01/2004 5:08:45 PM EST by vannrox
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1088571/posts
The Yardangs of Mars
Geological Society (UK) | July 24, 2004 | staff
Posted on 01/01/2005 2:18:55 PM EST by SunkenCiv
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1312117/posts
Images reveal 'sea of ice' near Mars' equator
Associated Press | Feb 26, 2005
Posted on 02/26/2005 4:02:49 AM PST by FYREDEUS
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1351506/posts
It would probably condense there because of the cooler temperatures.
YEAH BABY this is GREAT HISTORIC NEWS!!!
There is life...we will find it....bacteria....worms...who knows
whats crawling around in the dirt.
We can't live on Mars....its slightly bigger than the moon...
gravity is toooo weak for us to be healthy. We can live in orbit
and come down to dig and find fossils....who knows what!!!
This is NASA's problem...their PR department SUCKS. That should have been a non-story. Instead every time there's an article about the good things that NASA is doing, Nowak creeps into the discussion.
Well for that we need heavy-lift. I.e. something on the order of the Saturn V. Which is COMING with Ares V, provided that NASA isn't messed with as far as the budget goes. As far as the pressure goes, it's not about gravity. It's about density. If we heat the planet, we release the sequestered CO2 and H2O faster than the solar wind can strip away molecules from the top of the atmosphere. Then we've created a denser atmosphere, higher density, higher mass, higher pressure.
If it were ONLY about gravity, Mars would ALREADY have an atmospehre with 1/3 the pressure of MSL on Earth, because Mars gravity is 1/3g. And the moon would have a 1/6bar atmosphere. It doesn't work that way.
Or maybe not a direct impact. The gravitational attraction of a near miss by a large rock (planet-size or nearly) could strip off almost all the water, very quickly, and leave one hemisphere of Mars very different from the other hemisphere, as it is now.
Yeah, I saw that less than an hour after I asked. Laughed when I saw it. =)
Bump for later read.
Their PR is GREAT.
Has the US press ever
described the events
around NASA's TOMS
ozone monitoring mess
caught by Forest Mims?
You've got to wonder
how much is unseen given
all the stuff we see.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.