[AaronInCarolina]

"The proponents [of a climate crisis] seemed underarmed for the debate and, not surprisingly, it swung against them, particularly when Schmidt made the fatal debating error of dismissing the ability of the audience to judge the scientific nuances," ScientificAmerican.com’s David Biello wrote.

Anyone who reads RealClimate.org knows that Gavin Schmitt talks down to anyone who he thinks disagrees with him. If you have a dissenting opinion, its because you are not the scientist he is. In fact, every scientist who comes out with a paper or study that questions the conventional wisdom as defined by Gavin and the IPCC is a scientist to be discredited, not first listened to objectively.

[Grampa Dave]

Thanks for the feedback.

Gavin appears to be the typical elite liberal pseudo intellectual. Use bad science, and screams and shouts until he has silenced his opponents.