Replies

Agree completely. Look, the left never sleeps. They have a goal of reshaping society in their image. They -never- let up trying to achieve it.

Thats what makes so angry about "Captain Ed", Malkin, Hewitt, etc. for attacking Coulter. They are playing into the hands of the left-wing. And know it.

The whole "hate speech/PC Speech code" nonsense is just another way for the Left to control thought and public speech in this country.

That conservatives are buying into it, is truly "disgusting and Hateful".

There's a difference between private conduct, and public speech. I wouldn't invite a homophobe/racist to a dinner party, so he could pop off about "faggots" and "n-words".

But that doesn't mean we need a law or a college speech code to punish people for saying "bad" words.

And as we know, Coulter was joking about going into rehab for using the word. She wasn't using it to "smear" Edwards.

Meanwhile, in a parallel (but vastly different) universe:

Isaiah Washington holds the award for outstanding actor in a drama series for his work on ‘Grey’s Anatomy’ at the 38th NAACP Image Awards, Friday, March 2, 2007, in Los Angeles.

"Thats what makes so angry about "Captain Ed", Malkin, Hewitt, etc. for attacking Coulter. They are playing into the hands of the left-wing. And know it."

It's a blog-eat-blog world out there.

And a lot of these people don't like sitting at the back of the room at CPAC while Ann Coulter is speaking from the stage.

Some of them, like Captain Ed, have been "conservative" since way back to 2003. And they want their rewards for all the years laboring in the trenches, too.

And they are willing to tear down anyone they perceive in their way to get it.

>> Look, the left never sleeps. They have a goal of reshaping society in their image. They -never- let up trying to achieve it. Thats what makes so angry about "Captain Ed", Malkin, Hewitt, etc. for attacking Coulter. They are playing into the hands of the left-wing. And know it. <<

So where were you when Ann Coulter lead the charge to lynch John Roberts? Her looney "he's another Souter" reasoning might have been different than the motives the leftists had for lynching Roberts, but ultimately she sided with the likes of Barbara Boxer, Diane Feinswine, Hillary, Dickhead Durbin, Ted Kennedy, Osama Obama, and Chuckie Schumer in trying to bring down Roberts.

Ann sided with leftists against one of the most qualified conservative judges of our generation. Where was your "outrage" then?

”In the 1995 case of Barry v. Little, Judge Roberts argued—free of charge—before the D.C. Court of Appeals on behalf of a class of the neediest welfare recipients, challenging a termination of benefits under the District’s Public Assistance Act of 1982. I'm glad to hear the man has a steady work record, but how did this make it to the top of his resume? Bill Clinton goes around bragging that he passed welfare reform, which was, admittedly, the one public policy success of his entire administration (passed by the Republican Congress). Now apparently Republicans want to pretend the Party of welfare queens! Soon the RNC will be boasting that Republicans want to raise your taxes and surrender in the war on terrorism too. Finally, lets ponder the fact that Roberts has gone through 50 years on this planet without ever saying anything controversial. That’s just unnatural. By contrast, I held out for three months, tops, before dropping my first rhetorical bombshell, which I think was about Goldwater. It’s especially unnatural for someone who is smart and there’s no question but that Roberts is smart. If a smart and accomplished person goes this long without expressing an opinion, they'd better be pursuing the Miss America title. Apparently, Roberts decided early on that he wanted to be on the Supreme Court and that the way to do that was not to express a personal opinion on anything to anybody ever. It’s as if he is from some space alien sleeper cell."
'SOUTER IN ROBERTS CLOTHING'
-- Ann Coulter, Ann Coulter.com, 7-30-05