Replies

For someone to come on these threads and offer the truth about someone, in this case Rudy, it is NOT spam. You want to call it spam because it upsets you to see someone tell the truth about your candidate of choice. You must realize that 75 percent of FReepers want someone else for President. The polls on hypothetical elections always give Rudy about 25 percent of the vote, that means that 75 percent of FReepers want someone else. These threads are made for debate, so if Duncan supporters come on Rudy threads and push Duncan that is their right and they are doing what FR was designed for.

As far as I can see the Rudy supporters are the big name callers, very rarely responding with actual facts and never successfully disproving the comments Rudy has made at various times, by his own words he is NOT a conservative, I don't care how much the RNC white washes him and holds him up as the shining example of Republicanism, he is NOT a conservative and will be no better than any democrat if he takes office, IMO. A real conservative is electable. If you guys don't want to see Hitlery in the WH in 08 then maybe you should get behind the conservatives who want a real conservative in office.

The polls on hypothetical elections...

Polls on hypothetical elections that include hypothetical candidates aren't a gauge of anything, except of people's fantasies. I am more interested in polls about serious candidates who have a chance to win.

in this case Rudy, it is NOT spam

Sure it is... when someone puts some chart or graph pro or con and obsessively posts it over and over to the point where people no longer even look at it..it's spam.

But more then that it reflects on some weird OCD thing goin on.

For someone to come on these threads and offer the truth about someone, in this case Rudy, it is NOT spam.

When it is the repeated posting of the exact same post/graphic/argument that has been posted on dozens of other threads, and when it does not address the points of the article, then yes, it ~is~ spam.

I'd be willing to bet that most of the time, they don't even bother reading the article.