[Corin Stormhands]

For someone to come on these threads and offer the truth about someone, in this case Rudy, it is NOT spam.

When it is the repeated posting of the exact same post/graphic/argument that has been posted on dozens of other threads, and when it does not address the points of the article, then yes, it ~is~ spam.

I'd be willing to bet that most of the time, they don't even bother reading the article.

[CWOJackson]

Poor choice of words on his part. He claims he's not spamming but they sure aren't happy to talk about Duncan's pork.

Duncan Hunter's voting record proves he's nothing more then another big spender Republican. He's not the solution, he's part of the problem.

[supercat]

When it is the repeated posting of the exact same post/graphic/argument that has been posted on dozens of other threads, and when it does not address the points of the article, then yes, it ~is~ spam.

I am not a Giuliani supporter, but I do find some of the repetition to be tiresome. My opposition for Giuliani is predicated mostly on two things:

1. As Mayor, he sought to use executive power to restrict firearms nationwide, despite a lack of legislatively-granted authority to do so.
2. He has not repudiated nor apologized for such actions, and as such I see no reason to believe that he would not, if elected, use the office of the President likewise.

I don't fully trust Mitt Romney, but at least he's trying to say he's on the side of gun owners; if he gets elected with their help, I would expect him to be loath to stab them in the back. I have no such confidence in Rudy Giuliani.