Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kabar
I have no idea what specific projection you are referring to.

That figures.

This isn't rocket science.

Good thing because you would crash it.

Being slightly more well read then you I suggest you go look up "The Population Bomb"

I repeat projected equals poppycock.

110 posted on 03/09/2007 3:09:24 PM PST by Harmless Teddy Bear (All that is required for evil to triumph is that good men do nothing -E. Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]


To: Harmless Teddy Bear
That figures.

You mean it wasn't the Bureau of the Census? Look, you can find any kook to come up with whatever you want. I am using the USG's Bureau of Census projections. What is its political agenda, to understate or overstate the figures?

Good thing because you would crash it. Being slightly more well read then you I suggest you go look up "The Population Bomb" I repeat projected equals poppycock.

I read it when it first came out and still have a beaten up paperback copy of it. What I want to hear from you is not baseless critiques, but why you believe the Bureau of the Census figures are inaccurate. In fact, they could be understated.

I don't see how Ehrlich's projections are germane here. You seem to be missing my point about how immigration, legal and illegal, are contributing to the population growth of the US, not the planet. The US has enough food, water, and shelter to support more than a billion people. In the past seven years we have added 20 million people; in the past 17 years, almost 53 million; and in the past 37 years, 100 million. Do you dispute those facts?

115 posted on 03/09/2007 6:47:30 PM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson