Posted on 03/08/2007 2:08:18 PM PST by Cagey
SAN FRANCISCO -- Paper or plastic won't mean the same for shoppers in San Francisco if some city supervisors get their way.
A proposal up for consideration next week would prohibit large grocers from using regular plastic bags. Supporters of the ban say the bags eat up fossil fuels, litter the streets and choke wildlife.
The measure would require grocery stores to offer only bags made of recyclable paper, plastic that can be turned into compost, or sturdy cloth or plastic that can be reused.
The proposed ban has the support of San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom. But it's opposed by the California Grocers Association as potentially doing more damage to the environment.
President Peter Larkin said confused consumers would wind up mixing biodegradable bags with regular plastic bags in recycling bins, thereby contaminating recycled plastic.
I'm glad I don't live in San Francisco. I'd have a terrible time trying to pick up dog poop with paper bags, as opposed to the nifty plastic ones. :)
(Used to be we'd rake up the poop and toss it in the trash, but since the plastic bags trend with dog-walkers, I've found it's so much easier to just pick it up with hand in plastic bag.)
I use canvas bags too. You get a $0.05 discount per tote at check out because it saves them money at my local grocer. They always give me a dirty look though like I am hiding merchandise in there or something LOL.
Now we're cookin'!
But your opinion is in conflict with the facts. And then you're stating it as fact.
I went to the site and have no idea what it was you invented.
My grocery store pays 6 cents for each canvas bag you use. They also sell cheap but sturdy canvas bags for a buck a piece. The number of people that reuse bags has considerably increased since they started this. Maybe SF should take note.
It's a market structure and business model, patentable under current law.
My opinion is my opinion. Paper bags are bidegradable. Those ARE facts.
Your opinion is your opinion, but when you say "Paper is still better. Always has always will be." you're making a difinitive declaration as if it is fact, but it isn't because the facts say plastic is better and your opinion is wrong. So now you've listed off one fact that kind of vaguely helps out paper. Except of course it takes a while to biodegrade, and there are chemicles used in landfills that help get rid of plastics, so again the biodegredation thing only matters for the bags that become litter. Then there's still the heavier bulkier problem, plus the paper recycling is a joke problem, and subsequently the slaughtering of trees problem. The facts are clear, plastic is better and your opinion isn't with the bytes it's written on.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.