Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: catroina54
IF a mother-to-be doesn't believe in abortion,then WHY all these pre-natal tests ?

That was one of my questions.

Would they run these tests REGARDLESS of how I might respond to any test results, especially to prepare for the pending birth of a baby that might need special medical care?

They didn't opt to run the tests anyway, so apparently not.

42 posted on 03/07/2007 6:30:57 PM PST by cgk (I am emboldened by my looks to say things Republican men wouldn’t. - Ann Coulter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: cgk

i had one child at the "old" age of 46
and fortunately the midwifery practice respected my views--i didn't wanna know nothin'--i don't think i could deal with that knowledge
and even with the other pregnancies when younger i didn't bother with all the sonograms,exotic blood work etc etc
as i didn't even want to know boy/girl.
i like the surprise announcement.
what i am now wondering,is--will the time eventually come that IF one refuses these tests...you won't get the care or COVERAGE ? THE state will simply refuse/deny you on the grounds of liability,COSTS of care of a severely handicapped preemie etc.


45 posted on 03/07/2007 6:44:51 PM PST by catroina54
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson