1 posted on
03/06/2007 8:35:02 AM PST by
Dog
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-96 next last
To: Dog
2 posted on
03/06/2007 8:36:00 AM PST by
LYSandra
To: Dog
Now breaking on all cable networks...
3 posted on
03/06/2007 8:36:10 AM PST by
Dog
To: Dog
If he was a hot looking babe, we'd all declare him innocent.
4 posted on
03/06/2007 8:36:51 AM PST by
pissant
(http://www.gohunter08.com/)
To: Dog
Dog, you got the first thread of 10000 to come.
5 posted on
03/06/2007 8:37:10 AM PST by
silverleaf
(Fasten your seat belts- it's going to be a BUMPY ride.)
To: Dog
7 posted on
03/06/2007 8:37:35 AM PST by
Empireoftheatom48
(God bless our troops!! Our President and those who fight against the awful commie, liberal left!!)
To: Dog
Uh oh. I'll postpone my trip out to see what happens.
8 posted on
03/06/2007 8:37:49 AM PST by
Peach
(The Clintons' pardoned more terrorists than they captured or killed.)
To: Dog
I hope the lone holdout for acquittal didn't surrender.
9 posted on
03/06/2007 8:38:02 AM PST by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Islam is a religion of peace, and Muslims reserve the right to kill anyone who says otherwise.)
To: Dog
11 posted on
03/06/2007 8:38:29 AM PST by
JamesP81
(Eph 6:12)
To: xzins; blue-duncan
12 posted on
03/06/2007 8:39:05 AM PST by
P-Marlowe
(LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
To: Dog
You know it's going to be "Guilty" -- that's just how things have been going lately.
13 posted on
03/06/2007 8:39:44 AM PST by
jdm
To: Dog
The DBM is salivating over the prospect of a guilty verdict.
If Libby is found guilty the VP is the next target!!
16 posted on
03/06/2007 8:40:04 AM PST by
PISANO
To: Dog
In their questions, which were released Tuesday morning, jurors seemed confused about what Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald was alleging. This case is so bogus, not even the jury understands what the charges are.
18 posted on
03/06/2007 8:40:31 AM PST by
HisKingdomWillAbolishSinDeath
(All the horns of the wicked also will I cut off; but the horns of the righteous shall be exalted.)
To: Dog
19 posted on
03/06/2007 8:40:35 AM PST by
EternalHope
(Boycott everything French forever. Including their vassal nations.)
To: Dog
Former White House aide I. Lewis 'Scooter' Libby arrives at Federal Court in Washington, Tuesday, March 6, 2007, with his attorney Theodore B. Wells for the day's jury deliberations for his perjury trial. (AP Photo/Gerald Herbert)
20 posted on
03/06/2007 8:40:45 AM PST by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi ......)
To: Dog
24 posted on
03/06/2007 8:41:37 AM PST by
Miss Didi
("Good heavens, woman, this is a war not a garden party!" Dr. Meade, Gone with the Wind)
To: Dog
I have a bad feeling he is guilty on at least one count of perjury and one of obstruction.
25 posted on
03/06/2007 8:41:39 AM PST by
finnman69
(cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
To: Dog
I wonder if the networks will break from their Anna Nicole Smith coverage...
28 posted on
03/06/2007 8:42:33 AM PST by
P-40
(Al Qaeda was working in Iraq. They were just undocumented.)
To: Dog
Biggest leftist show trial of an innocent man since Stalin's show trials of the 1930's. An absolute defecation on any concept of justice.
To: StarFan; Dutchy; alisasny; BobFromNJ; BUNNY2003; Cacique; Clemenza; Coleus; cyborg; DKNY; ...
Just breaking...
32 posted on
03/06/2007 8:44:30 AM PST by
nutmeg
(National Security trumps everything else.)
To: Dog
I was just re-reading firedoglake's account of Fitz's closing remarks, how they were amazed Wells didn't object to all the conspiracy stuff Fitz was throwing at the jury. Jeffress finally objected, but only after the damage was done. I think this was deliberate by the defense. I think they thought was hanging hemself by his own petard. It is prohibited for a prosecutor to present closing remarks based on evidence that wasn't introduced in the trial, and that is EXACTLY what Fitz did.
Fitz was lying when he said he was simply arguing Libby's state of mind. No, he was prejudicing the jury by arguing that a covert agent was outed, that her life was jeopardized, and that this was done because the admin was attacking a critic for exposing its lies about pre-war Iraq intelligence. Fitz had provided no evidence, other than hearsay, for any of this. I think Wells was thinking, "Thank you very much, Fitz."
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-96 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson