To: Nasty McPhilthy
so comparing Edwards to gays is a slur?
3 posted on
03/05/2007 3:35:47 PM PST by
CzarNicky
(The problem with bad ideas is that they seemed like good ideas at the time.)
To: CzarNicky
Its and insult to gays to call them an Edwards.
7 posted on
03/05/2007 3:39:59 PM PST by
pissant
(http://www.gohunter08.com/)
To: CzarNicky
so comparing Edwards to gays is a slur?Gays were pretty offending by the association to Edwards. It offended their sense of masculinity. I can't really blame them, there...
11 posted on
03/05/2007 3:42:31 PM PST by
Caipirabob
(Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
To: CzarNicky
"so comparing Edwards to gays is a slur?"
Yes. Gays don't deserve that.
12 posted on
03/05/2007 3:42:47 PM PST by
MPJackal
("If you are not with us, you are against us.")
To: CzarNicky
Yes, the gays are very insulted to be associated with the Breck girl.
I always thought that fags were cigarettes.
And I recently learned that "Garamond" is the gay font.
55 posted on
03/05/2007 4:29:28 PM PST by
killermosquito
(Buffalo (and eventually France) is what you get when liberalism runs its course.)
To: CzarNicky
so comparing Edwards to gays is a slur?I've maintaned for a very long time that all this gay stuff can't last. This is a small bit of proof.
Anti-gay is built into us, at least into the male, in time the gay stuff will crumble.
A lot of damage can occur, of course, but eventually gays will be gone, replaced by real men.
67 posted on
03/05/2007 4:45:17 PM PST by
Balding_Eagle
(If America falls, darkness will cover the face of the earth for a thousand years.)
To: CzarNicky
Good evening.
"so comparing Edwards to gays is a slur?"
If you were homosexual wouldn't you consider it a slur to have an ambulance chasing metrosexual compared to you?
Michael Frazier
79 posted on
03/05/2007 5:12:05 PM PST by
brazzaville
(no surrender no retreat, well, maybe retreat's ok)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson