Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Doohickey
No, I think they would effectively be black since color is relected light at various wavelenghts and black is the absence of color.

This stuff doesn't absorb - it is incredibly transparent (which is why it doesn't reflect). Therefore, they will look like they are covered with nothing.
63 posted on 03/02/2007 3:53:41 AM PST by beezdotcom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: beezdotcom
You and I were, perhaps, both wrong. The first application of the material was as you discussed - but at the end of the article we see: Maybe the answer is, (e) all of the above.

Maybe you make your lens coating out of this stuff, and the lens appears perfectly black because there is no possibility of light coming out once it goes in. Therefore it perfectly cloaks anything behind it.

If you were in a bubble of this stuff, you could see out perfectly (because it lets radiation in, but the bubble would appear perfectly black because light could not come out. The perfect thing to put behind a one-way mirror.

65 posted on 03/02/2007 5:18:39 AM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion (The idea around which liberalism coheres is that NOTHING actually matters except PR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

To: beezdotcom
The article, here, states that if the material is on a clear thing, it will be clear, but if on an opaque substance, it will look black.
70 posted on 03/03/2007 1:11:32 AM PST by Jedi Master Pikachu ( What is your take on Acts 15:20 (abstaining from blood) about eating meat? Could you freepmail?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson