Is Driving Rinos out of the GOP Good for the Country? Thought-Provoking Must-Read for Rudy-Haters.

FR | April 16, 2002 | Common Tator

[EternalVigilance]

Its a fact, you are a disruptor and divider. You try and separate anyone you can. I think you're despicable and the worst thing that can happen to conservatism.

I figured out that this is what you think the first 500 times you posted it, troll. Like I said, you need a new script.

[OKIEDOC]

Twenty five years ago a social seeking, corporate climbing feminist in our office gave me a book on how feminism/liberalism/gayism was going to defeat Americas traditional ways.

I will never forget that book about how all the feminists/liberals/gays had to do to win was divide and conquer from within.

Turn one faction against another.

Lincoln said a house divided can not stand.

Will Republicans stick together or will a house divided apply to Republicans.

There will be a lot of sack cloth, ashes and hand wringing by naivete Republicans who did not vote come January 20, 2009 during the inauguration of Hellary/Osama Obama.

[68 grunt]

I don't need a new script. Lurkers must be constantly advised, and members who have fallen for your chumpitute need to be reminded.

There is one way you can prove you're not a filthy pretend conservative, disrupting and dividing whenever you can. Simple! Stop posting disruptive and divisive nonsense.

[EternalVigilance]

Your scenario is an easily-avoided one. All the GOP has to do is nominate someone who represents conservative principles to keep the Reagan coalition intact.

[EternalVigilance]

There is one way you can prove you're not a filthy pretend conservative, disrupting and dividing whenever you can. Simple! Stop posting disruptive and divisive nonsense.

Says the man who has stalked me from thread to thread for several years posting the same disruptive and divisive nonsense.

[Fierce Allegiance]

I have no clue what that loser is up to, but he sure is pushing the envelope.

What an idiot.

[Fierce Allegiance]

Being stupid and nasty is a really bad way to try to end nastiness.

Be gone, troll.

[garv]

Why did Giuliani oppose the PBA ban that had the exact same life of the mother exception in 1997 and again in 2000?

He is on record supporting Clinton's veto of the PBA ban in 1997. That bill and every subsequent bill has had a "life of the mother exception". Pardon me if I find his recent comments less than trustworthy, especially since he tried to claim it was no different than his previous position.

[Cold Heat]

Yes, and Reagan's 11th commandment fell by the wayside for two election cycles, and now a third one.

The price for this will be very high indeed.

[Delphinium]

Rudy's position on PBA is exactly the same as Duncan Hunters....

These two Rudybots have lost all sanity.

No kidding, but when did the truth mean anything to them?

This is so bizzarre but not much of a surprise. Its right out of the democrat playbook to lie, lie lie and call the truth a lie.

if that doesn't work attack the messinger with a another lie.

[Cold Heat]

All the GOP has to do is nominate someone who represents conservative principles to keep the Reagan coalition intact.

Who's conservative principles? The traditional GOP principles, or yours?

You are not going to rewrite GOP history on my watch. These principles you espouse are social conservative crap that comes from one single faction in the party who are late comers to the dance.

What is happening, is a refutation of of those ideas that you brought with you, and notification that they will not be the issues we will be debating this cycle.

You can reject, accept or just go away. Nobody cares or gives a damn what you do from here on.

That is the message.

Hear it.

[68 grunt]

EVie, I'm only trying to divide you. You're trying to alienate anyone and everyone you can.

[68 grunt]

EVie, you're so cute, almost on queue.

[Delphinium]

He does have some obsession with you?

Why don't you just give in and wink at him:)

[68 grunt]

Come on, EVie, you're confusing your identities now. (Again)

[SJackson]

Yes, and the D's will be stupid if they nominate her. Let's not follow them in their stupidity to nominate someone on our side with even HIGHER negatives. (Hillary's are 48% last time I saw, and as it was pointed out, Newt's are in the 60's.)

I understand that arguement in favor of Guiliani, personally I won't default to him based on polls. I think Gingrich can address those issue if he runs. And who knows, maybe Romney can get to a point where more than a third of voters have an opinion, or Hunter to where they'll include him in the polls. The numbers being discussed above were from the Jan 30-31 Fox poll.

[EternalVigilance]

You can reject, accept or just go away. Nobody cares or gives a damn what you do from here on. That is the message. Hear it.

The RINO recipe for electoral success. Tell pro-life, pro-family, pro-gun, pro-God conservatives to go to hell.

Fact is, it's your attitude, one that is held by far too many Republican "leaders" and party hacks, that has brought us to the current pass.

[Blackirish]

Both Rudy and Hunter are on record as opposing PBA unless the mother's life is at stake.

Seems there has been a lot of lying going on by the RudyHaters club

[Valin]

Well if he's a Troll, he one who has been here longer than I

68 grunt
Since Feb 25, 1998

Because someone disagrees with you dose not make them a Troll.
As a Freeper told me years ago "Freerepublic..where political debate is a contact sport".

[SJackson]

Actually, that is not necessarily true. The best way to demonstrate it is by winning in the genral, which of course cannot happen unless one wins the nomination. Republicans don't always pick the nominee who can win, unfortunately.

If he runs, I'll be voting for Gingrich in the primaries. Based on todays data, the Republican with the best chance of winning in the general, 20 months away so the data is worthless, is clearly Rucy. But if things look the way they do today in Feb, I'll still vote for Gingrich. Just one of the choices on makes.

The primary process is important though. The majority of voters have no opinion at all about Romney. Maybe that's a plus in a way, but winning the primary requires he correct that. If he can't in the next 10 months, he won't be able to in the general. Primaries are a test of political skill.