Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RobRoy
I postulate that the decline started after World War II with the advent of urban sprawl, speeding up with accelerating suburban sprawl.

I think there's a lot of truth to this. I've said for some time that the basic strength of private property ownership got tossed out the window once this "ownership" involved suburban homes that really have no connection to the underlying economic principles of private property.

29 posted on 02/26/2007 10:20:52 AM PST by Alberta's Child (Can money pay for all the days I lived awake but half asleep?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child

What are you saying ? That owning rowhouses in the city promotes more of an understanding of private property than an acre in the suburbs ?

I'll bite - how do suburban homes differ from city homes in their private property aspects ?

Let's see - people in cities pay property taxes, wage taxes, city taxes, and usually extra sales taxes, while people in the suburbs pay property taxes, township taxes, and that's it.

I think you have your statement backwards.


78 posted on 02/26/2007 10:59:57 AM PST by cinives (On some planets what I do is considered normal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson