Skip to comments.
Tomb of Jesus doc uproar
AP via Sun Media ^
| 2007-02-26
| Marshall Thompson
Posted on 02/26/2007 8:07:03 AM PST by Clive
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 next last
1
posted on
02/26/2007 8:07:04 AM PST
by
Clive
To: Clive
James Cameron vs. Christianity...hmmm...somehow I think I know which side will win this argument.
2
posted on
02/26/2007 8:12:20 AM PST
by
joylyn
To: Clive
When will the DNA results be published?
3
posted on
02/26/2007 8:13:24 AM PST
by
ASA Vet
(The WOT should have been over on 11/05/1979.)
To: Clive
The burial site identified in Camerons documentary is in a southern Jerusalem neighborhood nowhere near the church. Well, then, that explains why the women, the disciples, the Jews, and the Romans ALL went to the wrong tomb when they looked for Jesus's body. They all thought he was buried at the site of the Holy Sepulcher, when in fact he was buried in a southern Jerusalem neighborhood nowhere near the church.
4
posted on
02/26/2007 8:14:25 AM PST
by
VRWCmember
(Everyone is entitled to my opinion.)
To: Clive
I've been monitoring the news for any signs of rioting and widespread disorder since this story broke....but then I remembered with which religion the story dealt.
5
posted on
02/26/2007 8:16:53 AM PST
by
Textide
To: Clive
"In 1996, when the BBC aired a short documentary on the same subject, archaeologists challenged the claims. Amos Kloner, the first archaeologist to examine the site, said the idea fails to hold up by archaeological standards but makes for profitable television." Kind of like "An Inconvient Truth".....
6
posted on
02/26/2007 8:17:11 AM PST
by
goodnesswins
(We need to cure Academentia)
To: Clive
Call the riot police out for the Christian riots and mass violence that is sure to follow this announcement......
Or not.
7
posted on
02/26/2007 8:18:41 AM PST
by
safeasthebanks
("The most rewarding part, was when he gave me my money!" - Dr. Nick)
To: Clive
Early favorite for next year's Oscar.
8
posted on
02/26/2007 8:19:24 AM PST
by
neodad
(USS Vincennes (CG-49) Freedom's Fortress)
To: Clive
I am beginning to believe that all of this hoopla is just a well place publicity campaign for the documentary.
9
posted on
02/26/2007 8:20:58 AM PST
by
darkwing104
(Let's get dangerous)
To: Clive
10
posted on
02/26/2007 8:24:59 AM PST
by
atomicpossum
(Replies must follow approved guidelines or you will be kill-filed without appeal.)
To: Clive
Cameron isn't a theologian or an archaeologist.
11
posted on
02/26/2007 8:25:42 AM PST
by
cripplecreek
(Peace without victory is a temporary illusion.)
To: Clive
They've already done Raiders of the Lost Ark -- so finding the Ark of the Covenant is passe'. Let's see, what's the biggest story we could come up with? How about finding the tomb of Jesus . . .
Cameron and Geraldo should team up.
To: VRWCmember
because the common belief among skeptics is that the
story about the resurrection of Christ is just
a story....so why would they use the historical
documents that talk about Christs' work as a basis
for anything historical...?
I wonder if the mDNA they analyzed was not from a worker
on the bone box, or some bug, or eukaryotic plant material....
I would like to see the results.
13
posted on
02/26/2007 8:28:21 AM PST
by
Getready
(Truth and wisdom are more elusive, and valuable, than gold and diamonds)
To: Clive
no riots in the street,
no fatwas,
no James Cameron becoming the room mate of Salmon Rushdie,
just atheists and hedonists who are being hypocritical when it comes to attacking christianity.
14
posted on
02/26/2007 8:28:33 AM PST
by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: Clive
One of the caskets even bears the title, Judah, son of Jesus, hinting that Jesus may have had a son.
A lot of young boys were named Jesus during that time period anticipating the messiah. It wasn't an uncommon practice.
15
posted on
02/26/2007 8:28:52 AM PST
by
JamesP81
(Eph 6:12)
To: Clive
Was/is the name "Jesus" a unique name in that area and time?...
At best, if not and out right forgery, it might be A "Jesus"
But it's not THE "Jesus" who was THE "Christ"
16
posted on
02/26/2007 8:29:17 AM PST
by
tophat9000
(Al-Qaidacrats =A new political party combining the anti American left and the anti Semite right)
To: Getready
To: ASA Vet
When will the DNA results be published?
Second Tuesday of next week...
18
posted on
02/26/2007 8:31:42 AM PST
by
WV Mountain Mama
(Algore put the mental in environmental.)
To: Clive
I wonder why christians aren't taking to the streets and threatening violence against this man and the channel for running this bunch of lies? The islamic radicals would have already been out there and the liberals would be championing their right to a supposed injustice. Let's get a lot more vocal about this kind of attack against the faith of millions of people around the world. Of course, we should not be surprised that a non-believer could supposedly provide proof of a tomb. Jesus said they would try to do that.
To: Clive
Jesus [a.k.a. Joses or "Joseph"] has been a common name in Palestine for centuries.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson