Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Food for thought.
1 posted on 02/24/2007 10:59:09 PM PST by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: PhiKapMom; BunnySlippers

PING -- I think this is of interest to the Rudy ping list.

"For Republican candidates, the toughest litmus tests are not about any actual policy alternatives, foreign or domestic, but about "social issues." What most social issues have in common is that they are none of the federal government's business, let alone the president's.

polls show that a substantial majority of Republican voters approve of Giuliani's positions on all social issues, so the demand for ideological purity in these cases seems to require that candidates capitulate to a minority of the minority party. That does not sound like a recipe for success."


2 posted on 02/24/2007 11:00:51 PM PST by FairOpinion (Tell Congress: Work for Victory in Iraq. Stop Hillary. Go to: http://www.TheVanguard.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FairOpinion

HArd to call the 2nd AMendment a "social issue". Or for that mater buying into ALgores global warming hysteria & Kyoto. Or wanting the Military to lift its ban on openly serving gays. Rudy and McCain are racing to see who can out-Gore Algore.

That won't fly in a debate with Hunter. Yep, just a bunch of pesky social issues.


3 posted on 02/24/2007 11:03:02 PM PST by pissant (http://www.gohunter08.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FairOpinion

Excellent article. Many of the issues that they claim he is weak on, he would have absolutely no bearing on.

I could see if he was running for Governor or Legislator or nominated to be a SCOTUS nominee but the President will never do anything meaningful on Abortion or Gay Marriage or Guns for that matter.


4 posted on 02/24/2007 11:04:49 PM PST by spikeytx86 (Pray for Democrats for they have been brainwashed by their fruity little club.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FairOpinion
Food for thought.

I quit eating cotton candy when I became an adult.

6 posted on 02/24/2007 11:05:40 PM PST by EternalVigilance (With "Republicans" like these, who needs Democrats?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FairOpinion

This piece would fit better on DU than FR.


21 posted on 02/24/2007 11:22:40 PM PST by EternalVigilance (With "Republicans" like these, who needs Democrats?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FairOpinion

Garbage.


26 posted on 02/24/2007 11:29:53 PM PST by Jim Robinson (It's "originalists" not "constructionists.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FairOpinion

polls show that a substantial majority of Republican voters approve of Giuliani's positions on all social issues

 

A Majority. Baloney!!

32 posted on 02/24/2007 11:38:51 PM PST by gpapa (Boost FR Traffic! Make FR your home page!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FairOpinion

So now you're posting crapweasel commies from the Washington Post.

He's about as conservative as Trotsky.


36 posted on 02/25/2007 12:40:14 AM PST by Luke21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FairOpinion
The author hope that readers don't put any thought into this.

The federal government will never pass a law banning or permitting abortion, so a presidential candidate's opinion on that subject has no practical relevance.

We have banned certain proceedures. We could ban a non-parent or guardian taking a minor across state lines. Things like the Mexico City policy, medicare funding for abortion all matter.

Some hope the Supreme Court judges might limit Roe v. Wade, and thus return some authority to the states, but the next president is unlikely to have many chances to change this relatively young court.
How old are Souter and Ginsburg?

The federal government will never pass a law banning or prohibiting states and religious organizations from defining marriage, and presidents cannot enact constitutional amendments, so gay marriage is not a federal issue, either.
What about something as pressing as whether New York now needs to recognize civil commitment ceremonies from New Jersey? That is a Federal issue.

The federal government cannot prohibit stem cell research from occurring somewhere in the world, and the Feds are unlikely to meddle in private or state efforts to either discourage or support such research.
1. We could ban Fetal stem cell research.
2. The federal government funds such research. We could stop doing so.

Licensing of handguns is mainly a local issue, and no candidate is about to push for ending the federal ban on machine guns and assault rifles.
We could end the stupid rules on banning semi-automatic guns that look like "assault rifles" to the ignorant.
We can protect the firearms industry against the unConstitutional legal assaults by cities like New York.

Yet polls show that a substantial majority of Republican voters approve of Giuliani's positions on all social issues, so the demand for ideological purity in these cases seems to require that candidates capitulate to a minority of the minority party. That does not sound like a recipe for success.
Really. I'd love to see those polls.

Reporters compiling lists of where candidates stand on the issues could simplify the process by asking where candidates stand on issues in which a presidential decision might actually be involved -- such as avoiding wars, establishing a workable immigration policy or restraining runaway federal spending.
Isolationism, open-borders lunacy, and a plug for fiscal restraint. Sounds liberal to me. Besides, most American like the Federal programs that benefit them.

I'm not surprise that the author is from Cato.

40 posted on 02/25/2007 1:53:34 AM PST by rmlew (It's WW4 and the Left wants to negotiate with Islamists who want to kill us , for their mutual ends)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FairOpinion

Ignoring the real pressure group is the Sheehan wing of the demonrat party. Soros funded and determined to bring downt he United States of America, sooner rather than later.


41 posted on 02/25/2007 3:13:19 AM PST by OldFriend (Swiftboating - Sinking a politician's Ship of Fools by Torpedoes of Truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FairOpinion

bump for later reading, adding Duncan Hunter keyword


43 posted on 02/25/2007 9:37:56 AM PST by Kevmo (The first labor of Huntercles: Defeating the 3-headed RINO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson