Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This investigative reporter compares military vehicles for field soldiers. The successful vehicle is completely open - no doors, roof, or sides and did not meet bid specs. The second vehicle is completely enclosed with armor and meets all bid specs. The successful bidding company is run by retired colonel with contacts at the Pentagon. It seems Congress should be investigating situations like this rather than spending days debating meaningless, non-binding resolutions. If this is true, it is shameful. Reportedly, the successfully bidded vehicles have been in use and still do not meet the bid specs.

This is my first post. I hope that I have provided enough info for viewing the report(s).

1 posted on 02/24/2007 7:47:27 AM PST by mouske
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: mouske

No roof, doors, or sides. The succesful bid vehicle was a toboggan??


2 posted on 02/24/2007 7:53:22 AM PST by Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mouske

Not every military vehicle must be armored. Some roles require a lighter vehicle without armor. We fought WWII with topless jeeps and canvas sided trucks.

A vehicle like the Growler with an armored compartment would be a contradiction in terms.


3 posted on 02/24/2007 7:59:10 AM PST by bondjamesbond (No matter how PC you are, there's always somebody more PC than you, to condemn you as un-PC.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mouske
First what were the "Bid Specifications", if one has a federal government contract the company is NOW allowed to change any contract specification unless approved by the agency in charge and the contracting officer in charge of that buy. Further, the procurement officer and the contracts officer have full authority on the contact so I am skeptical of any reporter that knows little or nothing about government contracts and is probably trying to help the terrorist kill Americans.

As I read part of the “Specifications” the American Growler must be small, light weight and able to fit into an Osprey. Because the Osprey has space and weight limits, the vehicles must be less than 5 feet wide, weigh no more than 3,000 pounds and be able to withstand G-forces. At the same time, the weight must be evenly balanced so it won’t alter the aircraft’s balance.

This is more like a WW II and Korea and Vietnam Jeep that the armored vehicles in use.

And as I understand it, it is VERY illegal to take a camera into a factory making defense vehicles or weapons. The reporter should be in jail.
4 posted on 02/24/2007 8:23:41 AM PST by YOUGOTIT (56 Supporters of al Qaeda are seated in the US Senate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mouske


The American Growler has no doors or windows and is made that way. Picture at the below web site.

http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2005-12-28-corps-jeep_x.htm


5 posted on 02/24/2007 8:36:48 AM PST by YOUGOTIT (56 Supporters of al Qaeda are seated in the US Senate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Joe Brower

This ought to make you as livid as it did me. VERY ping worthy.


8 posted on 02/24/2007 9:11:30 AM PST by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mouske
I was very involved in the testing of this vehicle as a consulting engineer to General Dynamics OTS. This vehicle was NOT the primary reason for this award. The marines were not just buying this vehicle they were buying a weapon system. The Growler vehicle was designed to be a prime mover for a 120mm mortar system. Unfortunately for the other company the mortar that they offered was not and is not nearly as good as the GDOTS system.
9 posted on 02/24/2007 9:14:34 AM PST by Citadel84_1 (Reformed Rocket Scientst)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson