Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mouske
First what were the "Bid Specifications", if one has a federal government contract the company is NOW allowed to change any contract specification unless approved by the agency in charge and the contracting officer in charge of that buy. Further, the procurement officer and the contracts officer have full authority on the contact so I am skeptical of any reporter that knows little or nothing about government contracts and is probably trying to help the terrorist kill Americans.

As I read part of the “Specifications” the American Growler must be small, light weight and able to fit into an Osprey. Because the Osprey has space and weight limits, the vehicles must be less than 5 feet wide, weigh no more than 3,000 pounds and be able to withstand G-forces. At the same time, the weight must be evenly balanced so it won’t alter the aircraft’s balance.

This is more like a WW II and Korea and Vietnam Jeep that the armored vehicles in use.

And as I understand it, it is VERY illegal to take a camera into a factory making defense vehicles or weapons. The reporter should be in jail.
4 posted on 02/24/2007 8:23:41 AM PST by YOUGOTIT (56 Supporters of al Qaeda are seated in the US Senate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: YOUGOTIT
"...if one has a federal government contract the company is NOW allowed to change any contract specification..."

Is this what you intended to say?
It doesn't make any sense.

6 posted on 02/24/2007 8:59:28 AM PST by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: YOUGOTIT
That vehicle shown in the video built by the firm that didn't get the contract looked to fit the bill.
If it were my backside on the line no way in hell would I pick that piece of crap, and I'm being gracious in calling it that, which was chosen!
Which of the two vehicles would YOU want to be in combat in if they both fit the bill?
10 posted on 02/24/2007 9:16:34 AM PST by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: YOUGOTIT

"...it is VERY illegal to take a camera into a factory making defense vehicles or weapons."

Good point.


13 posted on 02/24/2007 9:24:18 AM PST by mouske
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: YOUGOTIT
The reporter should be in jail.
So should Sandy the Burglar.
15 posted on 02/24/2007 9:28:40 AM PST by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: YOUGOTIT

"And as I understand it, it is VERY illegal to take a camera into a factory making defense vehicles or weapons. The reporter should be in jail."

That was my first thought too.

And .. as usual .. the "drive-by media" is ready and willing to try to make some conspiracy out of a former military person having "connections" with the Pentagon. To me .. that just seems like a logical connection. What better person to be building vehicles for our military than a former military person.

When will the media ever get a brain!


19 posted on 02/24/2007 10:11:07 AM PST by CyberAnt (Drive-By Media: Fake news, fake documents, fake polls)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson