'And, he said, since history "includes instances of … official discrimination against gays and lesbians … it is reasonable for public educators to teach elementary school students … different sexual orientations." '
If we are going to follow such convoluted reasoning, why stop at teaching six year olds about men who like to have sex with each other? How about we teach them about the other aberrations they are likely to encounter in their lifetimes - prostitution, the pros and cons of oral and anal sex, transvestitism, fetishism, Sadomasochism and bondage, kiddie porn/child molesters/NAMBLA, etc.? Of course I am being ridiculous, but so was this asinine excuse for a "judge". Shame on MA, and Mitt Romney can flat out forget about getting my vote for ANYTHING. Sheesh.
Exactly!
"In the ruling, Wolf makes the absurd claim that normalizing homosexuality to young children is 'reasonably related to the goals of preparing students to become engaged and productive citizens in our democracy.' According to Wolf, this means teaching 'diversity' which includes 'differences in sexual orientation.'"
There are many variations in sexual orientation. How far will schools go? They must be "diverse" you know. There are many variations in sexuality, will schools teach 6 and 7 year olds about bisexuality, transgenderism, polygamy, incest, beastiality, asexuality, autosexuality, and other variety or subvariety of these?