A third and valid criticism is that Intelligent Design has no empirical data to support it.
All complex biological structures are emperical data supporting ID. Complex structures do not, however, support TOE. There is nothing in TOE to require change from simple to complex. All such arguments are based on assumptions that can only be explained by ID.
A physician discussing medical acupuncture addressed the weak record that acupuncture held when it comes to placebo controlled double blind studies. He said that using the measurement techniques of Western science evaluate acupuncture was like measuring the performance of a work horse by putting him in the Kentucky Derby. The "scientific method" is man man made. It is not infallible.
Who in the world are you kidding?