Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Rudder
A third and valid criticism is that Intelligent Design has no empirical data to support it.

A physician discussing medical acupuncture addressed the weak record that acupuncture held when it comes to placebo controlled double blind studies. He said that using the measurement techniques of Western science evaluate acupuncture was like measuring the performance of a work horse by putting him in the Kentucky Derby. The "scientific method" is man man made. It is not infallible.

43 posted on 02/22/2007 7:42:07 PM PST by outofstyle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: outofstyle
The "scientific method" is man man made. It is not infallible.

Good point, and a point which all scientists assume. That's why replication of results is so important in the scientific method. In all probability everything man conceives is not infallible, including the concept of God, a notion of a creator and intelligent design.

Where is all of the universe? In your head.

46 posted on 02/22/2007 7:50:32 PM PST by Rudder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

To: outofstyle
The "scientific method" is man made. It is not infallible.

The same is true of religions.

253 posted on 03/02/2007 8:10:40 PM PST by wireman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson