Replies

Maybe you'd like to reopen the old argument about whether the earth moves about the sun or the other way 'round, as long as you're opening up debates that biblical literalists lost centuries ago?

Because men who wished to explain their existence and how they got here with naturalistic means that do not adhere to the physical and natural laws of this universe is not a closure of the subject but an attack on God. I would add that these means you believe in are faith based because they do not happen today and can not be tested, therefore are a faith based belief boarding on religion, maybe it is, Evolutionist do call it Mother Earth, and would save a tree at the cost of a child.

This is a case of man thinking he is smarter than God and therefore can make decisions of moral consequences.

The Bible has never been disproved or lost any validity due to those who adhere to mud puddle origins.

You may ask how do I know God is real, well it would be because men saw him and wrote about him, Matthew, Mark, Luke and John just to name a few. There were also those who did not follow the teaching of Jesus who saw him and the miracles and resurrection.

I would also have to say that nature speaks of organization that could not come from random acts of chance, symbiotic relations is one great example, how you can believe a flower decided to have insects move the pollen to propagate the species is beyond me.