[shrinkermd]

I thought the program was both clever and entertaining. The two hosts (names fail me)were really good at projecting their material--they were convincing actors in their respective roles.

Much less professional was Rush and Anne. They seemed wooden and not really into their roles, but rather just playing themselves.

I plan to watch.

Just MO

[AaronInCarolina]

I thought the program was both clever and entertaining. The two hosts (names fail me)were really good at projecting their material--they were convincing actors in their respective roles.

Much less professional was Rush and Anne. They seemed wooden and not really into their roles, but rather just playing themselves.

I plan to watch.

Just MO

I had pretty much the exact same reaction. I thought that the star-power segments were the weakest of the show, and had seen and heard the star-power previews leading up to the show. As a result of the choice of using the weak star segments as preview material, I had low expectations. I was very pleased to find that the regular staff were much funnier than the Limbaugh/Coulter segments.

[Musket]

They seemed wooden...

I've read this criticism many times. Give 'em a break. They're not actors. Does anyone remember Nixon on Laugh-In? Or Algore on anything? Yeesh. Talk about wooden. Even so, it was a funny spot and I laughed out loud a number of times.

All in all, the show was great! I hope it lives forever and spawns many offshoots. God knows, the Libs provide plenty of material.