Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Australia to ban old-style light bulbs
Associated Press ^ | 02/20/07 | ROHAN SULLIVAN

Posted on 02/20/2007 9:38:04 AM PST by presidio9

The Australian government on Tuesday announced plans to phase out incandescent light bulbs and replace them with more energy-efficient compact fluorescent bulbs across the country. Legislation to gradually restrict the sale of the old-style bulbs could reduce Australia's greenhouse gas emissions by 4 million tons by 2012 and cut household power bills by up to 66 percent, said Environment Minister Malcolm Turnbull.

Australia produced almost 565 million tons of greenhouse gases in 2004, official figures show.

Prime Minister John Howard said the plan would help all Australians play a part in cutting harmful gas emissions: "Here's something practical that everybody will participate in."

In incandescent light bulbs, perfected for mass use by Thomas A. Edison in the late 19th century, electricity flows through a filament to create light. Much of the energy, however, is wasted in the form of heat.

Australia is not the only place looking to replace them with fluorescent lighting, which is more efficient and longer lasting.

Last month, a California assemblyman announced he would propose a bill to ban the use of incandescent bulbs in his state. And a New Jersey lawmaker has called for the state to switch to fluorescent lighting in government buildings within three years.

Cuba's Fidel Castro launched a similar program two years ago, sending youth brigades into homes and switching out regular bulbs for energy-saving ones to help battle electrical blackouts around the island.

The idea was later embraced by Castro's friend and ally, Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez, who announced his own program to save energy and in recent months has given away millions of incandescent bulbs in neighborhoods nationwide.

Under the Australian plan, bulbs that do not comply with energy efficiency targets would be gradually banned from sale. Exemptions may apply for special needs such as medical lighting and oven lights.

Fluorescent bulbs are currently more expensive than incandescent bulbs, but use only about 20 percent of the power to produce the same amount of light and last longer, making them more competitive over time, advocates argue.

Environmentalists welcomed the light bulb plan, but noted than the vast bulk of Australia's greenhouse gas emissions come from industry, such as coal-fired power stations.

They urged the government to set national targets for emission reductions and renewable energy.

"It is a good, positive step. But it is a very small step. It needs to be followed through with a lot of different measures," Australian Conservation Foundation spokesman Josh Meadows told Australian Broadcasting Corp. radio.

Howard has become a global warming convert, conceding in recent months for the first time that human activity is having an effect on rising temperatures.

But he has steadfastly refused to bring Australia into line with most of the world and ratify the Kyoto protocol on greenhouse gas reductions, arguing that doing so could damage Australia's coal-dependent economy.


TOPICS: Australia/New Zealand; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: climatechange; energy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 last
To: hunter112

I'm going to run all my lights all the time when I get my flouros.


61 posted on 02/20/2007 2:02:21 PM PST by ichabod1 ("Liberals read Karl Marx. Conservatives UNDERSTAND Karl Marx." Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Condor51

I think that cool color is just more comfortable on the human eye which, after all, has to be able to see both in the day and at night.


62 posted on 02/20/2007 2:06:13 PM PST by ichabod1 ("Liberals read Karl Marx. Conservatives UNDERSTAND Karl Marx." Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Oztrich Boy

Not really. The delay is about a second, tops, if that. I want them scared away. I don't want them hanging around.


63 posted on 02/20/2007 4:43:04 PM PST by sine_nomine (The United States...shall protect each of them against invasion. Article IV, 4. US Constition)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Blueflag
Older CFL's were notoriously bad for slow "warmup" times and an unpleasant bluish tint on the light temperature. I still have a Panasonic brand "globe" CFL that takes about 70 seconds to get full light output.

However, improvements in CFL technology has reduced the "warmup" times to under 20 seconds and also changed the color temperature to something with far less bluish tint. And they're a lot cheaper, too; the Panasonic CFL cost me US$15.00 back in 1999, and now I can get a CFL with the same light output for around US$2.00.

64 posted on 02/20/2007 8:29:05 PM PST by RayChuang88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
More signs of the stupidity of liberalism, socialism, fascism (private companies with state dictated rules).

Leftist politicians and many "green coats" push fluorescent lamps, but only have barely enough intelligence to flip on/off the switch.

What about the higher costs?
What about choice?
What about the poor choice they are in cold weather?
What about all the %$#^@ mercury with billions of bulbs?
There are low-mercury lamps and still no mercury-free, but they cost a LOT more. Also, don't forget that even though fluorescent lights have been used since before WWII, you will have idiots scared because they "didn't know they were polluting". Remember that these bulbs require special handling and recycling (thus more people driving around and transporting these bulbs in combustion engines and using more electricity for their compounds).

So in the big picture we'll end up using less intiial electricity, but spend a lot of it in regulations, mercury clean-up, and energy used to do this (especially when we get charged "mercury bulb deposit" taxes)! Thanks to the government educated enviro"mental" idiots!!!!!!! The money isn't saved... it's redistributed!

This socialist liberalism makes my head hurt. They hate capitalism and thinking, otherwise they'd mention LEDs and other non-toxic, high efficiency lighting methods under way to replace what we currently use.
65 posted on 02/21/2007 12:27:03 AM PST by 4KennewickMan2Invent (I didn't pay attention in school, I was too busy trying to learn something.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Condor51

I use some of the new "daylight" incandescent bulbs. I like the light they give off, but they don't last for crap. Typically less than three months.


66 posted on 02/21/2007 10:29:01 AM PST by Ignatz ("I think we should tax all foreigners living abroad.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson