To: MizSterious; Nix 2; green lantern; BeOSUser; Brad's Gramma; dreadme; Turk2; keri; ...
2 posted on
02/20/2007 9:22:39 AM PST by
knighthawk
(We will always remember We will always be proud We will always be prepared so we may always be free)
To: knighthawk
Ferret Face getting nervous...?
3 posted on
02/20/2007 9:23:04 AM PST by
mewzilla
(Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
To: knighthawk
Ok. Let's start with Saddaam's WMD hidden in your deserts...
4 posted on
02/20/2007 9:23:09 AM PST by
John123
(Dick Morris predicts Hitlery will be the worst president ever... I will now light myself on fire)
To: knighthawk
Talk to Israel about the Golan Heights.
5 posted on
02/20/2007 9:23:30 AM PST by
The Blitherer
(Duncan Hunter for President '08!)
To: knighthawk
Wonder if Syria thinks we will use them as target practice before going after against Iran for their Iraq attacks on our troops.
6 posted on
02/20/2007 9:24:03 AM PST by
rod1
To: knighthawk
Sounds like this has potential.
8 posted on
02/20/2007 9:25:03 AM PST by
RightWhale
(300 miles north of Big Wild Life)
To: knighthawk
Is flying "the bird" considered profound? Maybe if we hang our shoes off of it?!?
11 posted on
02/20/2007 9:27:49 AM PST by
MortMan
(Middle Age: When playing like a child makes you feel like an old man the next morning.)
To: knighthawk
"Syria wants to engage in a dialogue with the United States concerning all issues: Palestine, Israel, the Golan Heights, Israel, Iraq, Lebanon, Israel as well as anything else to do with Arab countries, Like Israel" an editorial in the official Ath-Thawra said Tuesday. "Syria insists on a serious and profound dialogue on all subjects without exception, meaning Israel." it added.
12 posted on
02/20/2007 9:28:06 AM PST by
Cogadh na Sith
(There's an open road from the cradle to the tomb.)
To: knighthawk
Maybe Assad has concluded we're really gonna do Iran, which could leave him the last islamo-fascist standing.
To: knighthawk
Here's your dialogue:
"Do you acknowledge the right of Israel to exist?"
"No?.....F-off."
15 posted on
02/20/2007 9:30:10 AM PST by
fat city
(What part of cognitive dissonance don't you understand?)
To: knighthawk
My first thought when I read this was this: Syria is misreading our internal debate on Iraq as a weak-willed American belief that we are losing, and of our newfound desire to give our enemies in the MidEast concessions.
Then, I realized that if the Dems had their way, this would not be a misreading at all.
To: knighthawk
Control your border with Iraq or we will have a "profound dialog" with you via our B-2 bombers.
Do these murderous scum know how to play our gutless wonders in the US Congress and the Failed Media or what?
21 posted on
02/20/2007 9:36:08 AM PST by
MNJohnnie
( If they say "speaking truth to power,"-they haven't had a l thought since the Beatles broke up)
To: knighthawk
Palestine: it doesn't exist.
Golan Heights: Israel's forever.
Iraq: we'll take care of Iraq.
Lebanon: it bears no no connection to Syria, whatsoever.
What else would they like to discuss?
22 posted on
02/20/2007 9:36:10 AM PST by
onedoug
To: knighthawk
As long as it isn't the usual one way dialog they produce.
24 posted on
02/20/2007 9:38:12 AM PST by
oyez
( My karma ran over your dogma.)
To: knighthawk
As long as it isn't the usual one way dialog they produce.
25 posted on
02/20/2007 9:38:15 AM PST by
oyez
( My karma ran over your dogma.)
To: knighthawk
Sure, and the United States insists upon a profound cessation of arms supplies and terrorists into Israel and Iraq.
You first, Syria.
31 posted on
02/20/2007 9:45:18 AM PST by
reagan_fanatic
(Don't mess with the Kitties)
To: knighthawk
This is interesting. I wonder what's driving it? All the appeasement talk from the Dems should be convincing them to walk away from the negotiating table, NOT towards it.
42 posted on
02/20/2007 11:06:32 AM PST by
DustyMoment
(FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson