Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

C-span 2 Misreporting Senate Iraq Vote
C-Span 2 | 2/17/2007 | C-Span 2

Posted on 02/17/2007 12:15:00 PM PST by Stajack

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-177 last
To: VRWCmember; leadpenny
I'm toying with him, VRWC.

He took several mentally unbalanced cheap shots at me upthread, and now I'm beating the pulp out of him with my rapier wit.

It's all in fun. (And trust me, it IS fun. He's an easy mark. :)

161 posted on 02/19/2007 2:51:22 PM PST by ohioWfan (PRAY for our President and our troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan

Now I have to take back everything I said in 157.

BTW, you're getting awfully specific on what my personal listening habits should be.



162 posted on 02/19/2007 2:54:26 PM PST by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan

No. He's a pompous baffoon and I lost all respect for Ailes when he didn't fire the creep over his indiscretions.


163 posted on 02/19/2007 2:57:00 PM PST by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan
"He's an easy mark."

You're delusional. I don't go out with just anyone.
164 posted on 02/19/2007 2:58:59 PM PST by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: leadpenny
I'm just trying to help you out, leadP.

I'd like to see what would happen if your intelligence rose and you became a worthy opponent.

165 posted on 02/19/2007 3:00:22 PM PST by ohioWfan (PRAY for our President and our troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: leadpenny

Well I certainly don't listen to O'Reilly, but I figured with your media fixation, you would.....


166 posted on 02/19/2007 3:00:57 PM PST by ohioWfan (PRAY for our President and our troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: leadpenny
I've been deleriously happily married for over 30 years now, lead.

I have high standards in men, and no offense, but you ain't even close......

167 posted on 02/19/2007 3:02:06 PM PST by ohioWfan (PRAY for our President and our troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: Steel Wolf

cloture - The only procedure by which the Senate can vote to place a time limit on consideration of a bill or other matter, and thereby overcome a filibuster. Under the cloture rule (Rule XXII), the Senate may limit consideration of a pending matter to 30 additional hours, but only by vote of three-fifths of the full Senate, normally 60 votes.

http://72.14.203.104/search?q=cache:sU7U-_o0kgUJ:www.senate.gov/reference/glossary_term/cloture.htm+Cloture&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=us


168 posted on 02/19/2007 3:41:59 PM PST by TexKat (Just because you did not see it or read it, that does not mean it did or did not happen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: VRWCmember
A quick calculation would show that a vote of 56 to 34 is 56 our of 90 which about 62 percent.

There's one problem with your calculation. The denominator should be 100 (the total number of Senators). Invoking cloture requires the approval of three-fiths of the 100 Senators (3/5 * 100 = 60 "yeas" required).

169 posted on 02/19/2007 6:07:15 PM PST by Stajack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: Stajack

Well that's one problem with the stupidity of the senate rules. cloture should only require two-thirds of those present and voting, not two-thirds of the entire body.


170 posted on 02/20/2007 6:15:46 AM PST by VRWCmember (Everyone is entitled to my opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: Stajack

When in doubt, pick "C", they are idiots.


171 posted on 02/20/2007 12:56:23 PM PST by Sword_Svalbardt (Sword Svalbardt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DalcoTX

"In my opinion, CSPAN and it family of radio and TV networks, is the absolute definition of fairness.

In reality, the headline is absolutely correct. The cloture vote was to end debate for rules for bringing the senate resolution to the floor. The resolution has not been debated on the senate floor, and that what a 60+ vote would have brought."

"The cloture vote was to end debate.." The resolution has not been debated..."

Which is it? Do you not understand that before a cloiture vote there is debate, (and after if the debate is not shut off for that matter)? Do you think it the debate somewhere other than on the floor of the Senate?


172 posted on 02/20/2007 7:20:39 PM PST by mjaneangels@aolcom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: DalcoTX

"The cloture was not for the House resolution, it was for debate on the rules to begin debate."

No. Cloture is a vote to end debate on a bill, resolution, or other vote and to get on with the voting. The rules were already decided. This is not a vote on what the rules will be, it is a vote to end debate on the issue at hand. It always has been and always will be.


173 posted on 02/20/2007 7:30:03 PM PST by mjaneangels@aolcom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: mjaneangels@aolcom

You are wrong. You are welcome to research it yourself. The cloture vote was to end debate and negotiations on which non-binding Senate resolution was going to be debated.


174 posted on 02/20/2007 8:58:41 PM PST by DalcoTX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: mjaneangels@aolcom

This was not like the controversies last summer regarding judicial appointments. Nominees were passed through committee and then debated on the floor. When debate was to end a cloture vote was held. A up/down vote was taken and that was it. Since senate resolutions do not originate in committee, there is a slight change in procedure.


175 posted on 02/20/2007 9:01:27 PM PST by DalcoTX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: DalcoTX

"You are wrong. You are welcome to research it yourself. The cloture vote was to end debate and negotiations on which non-binding Senate resolution was going to be debated."

First you say cloture is not to end debate, then I come back and say yes it is, then you tell me I am wrong and follow it with cloture is to end debate.

Regarding the rules those were decided when the Senate first came back to chambers at the first of this year. The debate has been and is about the issue of resolutions. Yes negotiations are involved, but this involved debate on all resolutions regarding our troops. The vote to end debate was not passed, therefore all debate is continuing including the resolution the Dems want.

I have studied this for several years. I have already looked it up. It has nothing to do with rules. The rules have already been determined.


176 posted on 02/21/2007 5:04:53 PM PST by mjaneangels@aolcom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: mjaneangels@aolcom

Nope, you are still wrong. Feel free to research it closer.


177 posted on 02/21/2007 6:54:36 PM PST by DalcoTX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-177 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson